<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #359&#8242;s counterpart, train #360 heads east with wood products from Prince George.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/359s-counterpart-train-360-heads-east-with-wood-products-from-prince-george/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Young</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17164</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17164</guid>
		<description>Here is a shot of 5432, a SD50F, in the paint chip CN, not the current scheme as I wrongfully referred to in the previous post. I guess that I never saw it in my time in Edmonton.


https://www.flickr.com/photos/66869919@N04/14518779141/in/photolist-o7Yxdi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a shot of 5432, a SD50F, in the paint chip CN, not the current scheme as I wrongfully referred to in the previous post. I guess that I never saw it in my time in Edmonton.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/66869919@N04/14518779141/in/photolist-o7Yxdi" rel="nofollow">https://www.flickr.com/photos/66869919@N04/14518779141/in/photolist-o7Yxdi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17162</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17162</guid>
		<description>Current CN 5432 is an SD60, originally an Oakway unit, which would have been toiling for BN when you took this shot, Steve. If CN 5432 is trailing here, it&#039;s been retired since roughly 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current CN 5432 is an SD60, originally an Oakway unit, which would have been toiling for BN when you took this shot, Steve. If CN 5432 is trailing here, it&#8217;s been retired since roughly 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Young</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17161</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17161</guid>
		<description>You guys really got me going. I went through my photos looking for 5432 and 5455 to see if I had any shots of an SD50F in anything other than stripes. I did not find any.
I only found SD60F and the DASH 8&#039;s in the paint chip NA scheme. 
When I searched online, I found the 5432 in the current one-stripe pattern.
Which brings me back to .... Are you sure that the second unit is a 50? I would be inclined to believe that it is a 60 from the second batch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys really got me going. I went through my photos looking for 5432 and 5455 to see if I had any shots of an SD50F in anything other than stripes. I did not find any.<br />
I only found SD60F and the DASH 8&#8242;s in the paint chip NA scheme.<br />
When I searched online, I found the 5432 in the current one-stripe pattern.<br />
Which brings me back to &#8230;. Are you sure that the second unit is a 50? I would be inclined to believe that it is a 60 from the second batch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17153</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17153</guid>
		<description>5432 was in CNNA, 5455 was in current scheme sans website. So it&#039;s likely either 5432 or 5537... not possible to tell which from that angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5432 was in CNNA, 5455 was in current scheme sans website. So it&#8217;s likely either 5432 or 5537&#8230; not possible to tell which from that angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17150</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17150</guid>
		<description>...as was 5455? Maybe others too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;as was 5455? Maybe others too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17149</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17149</guid>
		<description>I think 5432 was in a CNNA scheme as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 5432 was in a CNNA scheme as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Young</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17145</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17145</guid>
		<description>You have better eyes than I. 
I cannot even tell that it is a 60, not a 50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have better eyes than I.<br />
I cannot even tell that it is a 60, not a 50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26418#comment-17141</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1994-03-26-3-CN-360-X5532E-Wood-English-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17141</guid>
		<description>Seems that 5537 is the second unit on this train... only SD60F in the CNNA scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that 5537 is the second unit on this train&#8230; only SD60F in the CNNA scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
