<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 59 years and still kicking. MLW S-13 Trillium 108 has had quite the history, as it spent much of it&#8217;s life in Newfoundland on CN, before being bought by Trillium in 1999. Here, 108 brings a load of cars down the steepest grade (though this is just the top) in Canada. It just finished servicing the Fonthill Spur (up ontop of the hill behind the train) up in Thorold, and it&#8217;s heading down to St Catharines, to the few industries that still exist down off of the Grantham Spur.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/59-years-and-still-kicking-mlw-s-13-trillium-108-has-had-quite-the-history-as-it-spent-much-of-its-life-in-newfoundland-on-cn-before-being-bought-by-trillium-in-1999-here-108-brings-a-load-of-c/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-60346</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2024 14:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-60346</guid>
		<description>Docta the steepest grade may have been elsewhere. A CN track profile I have indicates 140 feet over 1.9 miles or 1.4%.

Goderich CNR is 2.78% per

https://www.bst-tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/rail/2021/r21t0007/r21t0007.html

Here is a discussion on grades.

https://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?15,3116207</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Docta the steepest grade may have been elsewhere. A CN track profile I have indicates 140 feet over 1.9 miles or 1.4%.</p>
<p>Goderich CNR is 2.78% per</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bst-tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/rail/2021/r21t0007/r21t0007.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.bst-tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/rail/2021/r21t0007/r21t0007.html</a></p>
<p>Here is a discussion on grades.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?15,3116207" rel="nofollow">https://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?15,3116207</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-27986</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-27986</guid>
		<description>A standard gauge loco was required at PA Basques to load/unload the ferry from North Sydney, so that standard gauge cars from the North American network could be be converted to narrow gauge during their short visit to the Rock. But 108 ( old 8617) was not there. In fact I believe those were new for the Moncton hump</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A standard gauge loco was required at PA Basques to load/unload the ferry from North Sydney, so that standard gauge cars from the North American network could be be converted to narrow gauge during their short visit to the Rock. But 108 ( old 8617) was not there. In fact I believe those were new for the Moncton hump</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-27973</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 01:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-27973</guid>
		<description>Hmm i will check in my old track profiles, but as far as i know the steepest hill although very short is  if you bring a train in the Halton outbound track. Let me look into it my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm i will check in my old track profiles, but as far as i know the steepest hill although very short is  if you bring a train in the Halton outbound track. Let me look into it my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctaPinklaces</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-27972</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctaPinklaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-27972</guid>
		<description>I dunno if it still holds that record but at one point the Thorold Subdivision was the steepest grade on CN trackage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno if it still holds that record but at one point the Thorold Subdivision was the steepest grade on CN trackage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-27971</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 22:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-27971</guid>
		<description>Steepest grade in Canada?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steepest grade in Canada?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctaPinklaces</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-27970</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctaPinklaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-27970</guid>
		<description>Yeah that’s what I meant. I probably shouldn’t get those two mixed up considering I have lots of family in New Brunswick lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that’s what I meant. I probably shouldn’t get those two mixed up considering I have lots of family in New Brunswick lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-27964</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-27964</guid>
		<description>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=4882</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=4882" rel="nofollow">http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=4882</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mberry</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=34313#comment-27963</link>
		<dc:creator>mberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 14:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC_0632-001edited.jpg#comment-27963</guid>
		<description>Newfoundland? That wouldn&#039;t be possible as this is a standard gauge locomotive and Newfoundland had narrow gauge trackage. Perhaps you meant New Brunswick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newfoundland? That wouldn&#8217;t be possible as this is a standard gauge locomotive and Newfoundland had narrow gauge trackage. Perhaps you meant New Brunswick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
