<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 597 makes a rare daytime appearance at Brantford with RLHH 3404 &#8211; RLHH 3049 &#8211; RLHH 3403 and 30 cars for Paris Jct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/597-makes-a-rare-daytime-appearance-at-brantford-with-rlhh-3404-rlhh-3049-rlhh-3403-and-30-cars-for-paris-jct/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18614#comment-8831</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2015 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/RLHH-3404.jpg#comment-8831</guid>
		<description>Because the SOR&#039;s reporting marks have always been RLHH, for RaiLink Hamilton Hagersville.  So G&amp;W used those reporting marks for the units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the SOR&#8217;s reporting marks have always been RLHH, for RaiLink Hamilton Hagersville.  So G&#038;W used those reporting marks for the units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18614#comment-8830</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2015 13:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/RLHH-3404.jpg#comment-8830</guid>
		<description>Anyone know why are they still using the Raillink reporting marks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know why are they still using the Raillink reporting marks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
