<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8793 a GE ES44AC is in for an engine overhaul. New 12 cylinder single turbocharger 4400 horsepower engine is set up on the lifter and ready to go.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/8793-a-ge-es44ac-is-in-for-an-engine-overhaul-new-12-cylinder-single-turbocharger-4400-horsepower-engine-is-set-up-on-the-lifter-and-ready-to-go/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 1014</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29282#comment-21144</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 1014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CP-8793-engine-change.jpg#comment-21144</guid>
		<description>I should have thought a little longer before putting my comment. Either first hand or through photos I&#039;m used to the proportions of a 16 cylinder engine. When I see a 12 sitting on the shop floor, right away you&#039;re thinking “there is room for more”. Actually, I&#039;m willing to gamble, the railroads are pretty happy with 4 less power assemblies to deal with. Should be some fuel savings too.
Thanks Paul.   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have thought a little longer before putting my comment. Either first hand or through photos I&#8217;m used to the proportions of a 16 cylinder engine. When I see a 12 sitting on the shop floor, right away you&#8217;re thinking “there is room for more”. Actually, I&#8217;m willing to gamble, the railroads are pretty happy with 4 less power assemblies to deal with. Should be some fuel savings too.<br />
Thanks Paul.   <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29282#comment-21138</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CP-8793-engine-change.jpg#comment-21138</guid>
		<description>I guess it&#039;s enough for now, there are some twin turbo 6000hp GE&#039;s on CSX though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s enough for now, there are some twin turbo 6000hp GE&#8217;s on CSX though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 1014</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29282#comment-21127</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 1014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CP-8793-engine-change.jpg#comment-21127</guid>
		<description>I find it curious when these 12 cylinder 4400hp engines have proven themselves that there has not been a revival or push for more horsepower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it curious when these 12 cylinder 4400hp engines have proven themselves that there has not been a revival or push for more horsepower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
