<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A nostalgic look back for us guys that remember the TH&amp;B. Engine 72, GP7, which was rebuilt to CP 1682 back in 1987, sits in front of a stall at the old roundhouse on Chatham St. It was retired in Sept. 2011. The roundhouse itself was razed in February 1992.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/a-nostalgic-look-back-for-us-guys-that-remember-the-thb-engine-72-gp7-which-was-rebuilt-to-cp-1682-back-in-1987-sits-in-front-of-a-stall-at-the-old-roundhouse-on-chatham-st-it-was-retired-in/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 22:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18357</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18357</guid>
		<description>Very nice, Mr. Mooney, very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, Mr. Mooney, very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18318</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 23:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18318</guid>
		<description>wait it&#039;s not the toronto roundhouse lol. sorry :/ and I am really not in favor of the GP20C-ECOs and their &quot;e-bells&quot; and funky cabs. Even though I like CN GP9RMs better, I would like if the ecos would have the original carbody</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait it&#8217;s not the toronto roundhouse lol. sorry :/ and I am really not in favor of the GP20C-ECOs and their &#8220;e-bells&#8221; and funky cabs. Even though I like CN GP9RMs better, I would like if the ecos would have the original carbody</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18317</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 23:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18317</guid>
		<description>great shot, it is always strange seeing pics from the past where there was expansive railyards and now when being at the rail museum how the track used to connect to the USRC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great shot, it is always strange seeing pics from the past where there was expansive railyards and now when being at the rail museum how the track used to connect to the USRC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18303</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18303</guid>
		<description>Sorry, lad. I guess we will have to wait for &quot;someone in the know&quot; to answer this. All I can tell you is by the Canadian Trackside Guide all x-TH&amp;B GP7s that remained(72-77) have been retired and 73 went to Cando, and 75 to JLCX. The TH&amp;B units when rebuilt became CP 1682-1687 in 1987. No mention of preservation. Now you&#039;ve got me wondering, as I seem to recall something of this preservation idea too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, lad. I guess we will have to wait for &#8220;someone in the know&#8221; to answer this. All I can tell you is by the Canadian Trackside Guide all x-TH&amp;B GP7s that remained(72-77) have been retired and 73 went to Cando, and 75 to JLCX. The TH&amp;B units when rebuilt became CP 1682-1687 in 1987. No mention of preservation. Now you&#8217;ve got me wondering, as I seem to recall something of this preservation idea too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driver8666</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18302</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver8666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18302</guid>
		<description>Since it was, wasn&#039;t this supposed to be preserved in its place? That&#039;s what I&#039;ve understood and it&#039;s been long known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it was, wasn&#8217;t this supposed to be preserved in its place? That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve understood and it&#8217;s been long known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18301</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18301</guid>
		<description>Driver8666: First loco by GMD in London was TH&amp;B 71, destroyed in an at grade accident in Welland in 1980, and scrapped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Driver8666: First loco by GMD in London was TH&amp;B 71, destroyed in an at grade accident in Welland in 1980, and scrapped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18300</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18300</guid>
		<description>Jacob:  Sure looks like one. I went thru some of my old photos but can&#039;t find the shot I took of whatever-it-is. But I am going to agree with you. :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob:  Sure looks like one. I went thru some of my old photos but can&#8217;t find the shot I took of whatever-it-is. But I am going to agree with you. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driver8666</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27385#comment-18297</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver8666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/THB-Chatham-St-edited.jpg#comment-18297</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t this supposed to be preserved, or did Hunter send this off to Indiana for ECO conversion? As far as I know it was supposed to be donated to the TRHA. 

In addition wasn&#039;t this the first locomotive built by GMD? If it was included in the ECO conversion, Hunter is in serious trouble. The decision to preserve this, if it&#039;s correct, was made before Hunter was in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t this supposed to be preserved, or did Hunter send this off to Indiana for ECO conversion? As far as I know it was supposed to be donated to the TRHA. </p>
<p>In addition wasn&#8217;t this the first locomotive built by GMD? If it was included in the ECO conversion, Hunter is in serious trouble. The decision to preserve this, if it&#8217;s correct, was made before Hunter was in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
