<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A westbound mixed train, likely #217 or 219, runs along the Brenmar siding, just east of Edmonton. It was a short siding, that has long since been removed.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/a-westbound-mixed-train-likely-217-or-219-runs-along-the-brenmar-siding-just-east-of-edmonton-it-was-a-short-siding-that-has-long-since-been-removed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Young</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26327#comment-17063</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1993-09-02-1-CN-X5457W-Mixed-Bremnar-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17063</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification. I guess I am so used to seeing the articulated deep well cars for double stack, that I never noticed the COFC&#039;s attempt to remain competitive. That&#039;s pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification. I guess I am so used to seeing the articulated deep well cars for double stack, that I never noticed the COFC&#8217;s attempt to remain competitive. That&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cn5248</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26327#comment-17061</link>
		<dc:creator>cn5248</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 23:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1993-09-02-1-CN-X5457W-Mixed-Bremnar-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17061</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve, I meant the second car behind the locomotives (appears to be a 5-unit articulated car for hauling containers or trailers, similar to https://www.steelcar.com/products/intermodal-spine). CN had droves of 85&#039; flatcars that they typically used for containers/trailers, as did CP (more for containers). Seeing TTX spine cars in Canada is relatively uncommon compared to how commonplace they are in the US. I think CP had a small group of spine cars in the &#039;90&#039;s for containers only; they were unusual that they were only 40&#039; long (per unit) and could accommodate 2 20&#039; containers on each platform. Also, nice catch on the SD50F pair; I wish CN still had them on the roster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve, I meant the second car behind the locomotives (appears to be a 5-unit articulated car for hauling containers or trailers, similar to <a href="https://www.steelcar.com/products/intermodal-spine" rel="nofollow">https://www.steelcar.com/products/intermodal-spine</a>). CN had droves of 85&#8242; flatcars that they typically used for containers/trailers, as did CP (more for containers). Seeing TTX spine cars in Canada is relatively uncommon compared to how commonplace they are in the US. I think CP had a small group of spine cars in the &#8217;90&#8242;s for containers only; they were unusual that they were only 40&#8242; long (per unit) and could accommodate 2 20&#8242; containers on each platform. Also, nice catch on the SD50F pair; I wish CN still had them on the roster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Young</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26327#comment-17060</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 22:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1993-09-02-1-CN-X5457W-Mixed-Bremnar-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17060</guid>
		<description>Now that you have me looking at this photo in more detail, I see that it is an EASTBOUND therefore it might be 218, but I doubt that because 218 usually left in the early evening, if I recall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that you have me looking at this photo in more detail, I see that it is an EASTBOUND therefore it might be 218, but I doubt that because 218 usually left in the early evening, if I recall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Young</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26327#comment-17059</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 22:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1993-09-02-1-CN-X5457W-Mixed-Bremnar-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17059</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but I do not know what a spine car is. Are you referring to the one in the siding? Is it not a center-beam flatcar for hauling lumber?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I do not know what a spine car is. Are you referring to the one in the siding? Is it not a center-beam flatcar for hauling lumber?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cn5248</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26327#comment-17057</link>
		<dc:creator>cn5248</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 21:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1993-09-02-1-CN-X5457W-Mixed-Bremnar-AB-Large.jpg#comment-17057</guid>
		<description>Is that a spine car? Don&#039;t see many of those in Canada. Another excellent photo Steve, thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a spine car? Don&#8217;t see many of those in Canada. Another excellent photo Steve, thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
