<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A yard job working Sarnia today, with a remote-operated SD60 on point. This was my first time seeing one of the remote SD60s. I was a bit torn when watching this job work the yard: I quite enjoy SD60s but I am never overly fond of beltpack units. I&#8217;d also much rather see 5440 out on the mainline than toiling away in the yard, but then again, it is better than not seeing it at all.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/a-yard-job-working-sarnia-today-with-a-remote-operated-sd60-on-point-this-was-my-first-time-seeing-one-of-the-remote-sd60s-i-was-a-bit-torn-when-watching-this-job-work-the-yard-i-quite-enjoy-sd60s/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38452#comment-34345</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 04:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1681.jpg#comment-34345</guid>
		<description>@CN9317. 2000/2100 are actually worse than the SD60&#039;s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CN9317. 2000/2100 are actually worse than the SD60&#8242;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jknott86</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38452#comment-34344</link>
		<dc:creator>jknott86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1681.jpg#comment-34344</guid>
		<description>Thanks Paul. I did notice one such combination last August when I was out in Thunder Bay. No shortage of CP yard jobs to be found there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul. I did notice one such combination last August when I was out in Thunder Bay. No shortage of CP yard jobs to be found there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38452#comment-34343</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1681.jpg#comment-34343</guid>
		<description>Nice shot James, CP is using some SD60&#039;s in yard service as well albeit mu&#039;ed to a beltpack equipped GP38-2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice shot James, CP is using some SD60&#8242;s in yard service as well albeit mu&#8217;ed to a beltpack equipped GP38-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CN9317</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38452#comment-34340</link>
		<dc:creator>CN9317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 19:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1681.jpg#comment-34340</guid>
		<description>What do you think of the 2000s and 2100s, ngineered?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of the 2000s and 2100s, ngineered?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38452#comment-34327</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 16:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1681.jpg#comment-34327</guid>
		<description>Trust me. The 5400 SD60&#039;s are way better in yard service than pulling tonnage on the main. All those years in coal service on the Powder River Basin took its toll. A shiny new coat of paint did not make them great units for the crews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me. The 5400 SD60&#8242;s are way better in yard service than pulling tonnage on the main. All those years in coal service on the Powder River Basin took its toll. A shiny new coat of paint did not make them great units for the crews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angelok</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38452#comment-34325</link>
		<dc:creator>angelok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 12:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1681.jpg#comment-34325</guid>
		<description>An ARMN refrigerated boxcar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ARMN refrigerated boxcar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38452#comment-34323</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 12:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1681.jpg#comment-34323</guid>
		<description>What car is that 4 in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What car is that 4 in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
