<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After a few months of the former &#8216;Espee&#8217; unit; GEXR 3054 leading GEXR 432, I was pleased this morning to find a matched pair of venerable EMD SD40-2&#8242;s on the point of this rather short, 22 car, 432.  Although theses units are not former CP Rail units, with all the SD40-2 retirements, these beauts are survivors.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/after-a-few-months-of-the-former-espee-unit-gexr-3054-leading-gexr-432-i-was-pleased-this-morning-to-find-a-matched-pair-of-venerable-emd-sd40-2s-on-the-point-of-this-rather-short-22-car-432/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 19:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25880#comment-16680</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/243.jpg#comment-16680</guid>
		<description>RLHH 3403 is ex CP on the SOR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RLHH 3403 is ex CP on the SOR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25880#comment-16677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/243.jpg#comment-16677</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  Thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25880#comment-16676</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/243.jpg#comment-16676</guid>
		<description>The Bridge Line was the division of CP that was the Delaware and Hudson (D&amp;H).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bridge Line was the division of CP that was the Delaware and Hudson (D&amp;H).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25880#comment-16670</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 04:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/243.jpg#comment-16670</guid>
		<description>Great shot!

It&#039;s 23 cars tho! LOL!!

Funny thing, you mentioned CP....these units spent a great deal of time leased to CP, the Bridge Line mostly, back on the 90&#039;s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shot!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s 23 cars tho! LOL!!</p>
<p>Funny thing, you mentioned CP&#8230;.these units spent a great deal of time leased to CP, the Bridge Line mostly, back on the 90&#8242;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
