<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After being relocated to the Simcoe County Museum in 2008 to allow for road reconstruction in Barrie, 1531 has had its asbestos removed. Despite the appearance, it is probably in better hands here at the museum.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/after-being-relocated-to-the-simcoe-county-museum-in-2008-to-allow-for-road-reconstruction-in-barrie-1531-has-had-its-asbestos-removed-despite-the-appearance-it-is-probably-in-better-hands-here-at/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 21:15:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pierre fournier</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26486#comment-17211</link>
		<dc:creator>pierre fournier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 23:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/IMG_4090s.jpg#comment-17211</guid>
		<description>It looked a lot better  when i took a pic of her in 82 at Barrie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looked a lot better  when i took a pic of her in 82 at Barrie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric May</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26486#comment-17206</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 13:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/IMG_4090s.jpg#comment-17206</guid>
		<description>When it was first relocated, the stack was back on after being removed for the move. A couple of years ago all of the piping underneath had been labelled, so someone is keeping track of everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it was first relocated, the stack was back on after being removed for the move. A couple of years ago all of the piping underneath had been labelled, so someone is keeping track of everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas Tyzuk</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26486#comment-17205</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Tyzuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 05:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/IMG_4090s.jpg#comment-17205</guid>
		<description>I would hope they have kept all the parts in storage, including the stack, and plan to put the engine back together and on display someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope they have kept all the parts in storage, including the stack, and plan to put the engine back together and on display someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
