<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After passing the Larocque lift bridge in Valleyfield, QC CN 326 makes its way to Coteau and eventually Taschereau yard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/after-passing-the-larocque-lift-bridge-in-valleyfield-qc-cn-326-makes-its-way-to-coteau-and-eventually-taschereau-yard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cp5756</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46011#comment-47255</link>
		<dc:creator>cp5756</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/CN-326-2.jpg#comment-47255</guid>
		<description>lucked out with the power here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lucked out with the power here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdfourty</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46011#comment-47251</link>
		<dc:creator>sdfourty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 18:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/CN-326-2.jpg#comment-47251</guid>
		<description>Very nice. So, I read that CSX is likely to remain in P.Q. given the STB&#039;s ruling and the inability of CN &amp; CSX to come to terms viz future CN non-access to shortlines in NY state etc....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. So, I read that CSX is likely to remain in P.Q. given the STB&#8217;s ruling and the inability of CN &amp; CSX to come to terms viz future CN non-access to shortlines in NY state etc&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Flood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46011#comment-47232</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Flood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 03:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/CN-326-2.jpg#comment-47232</guid>
		<description>Great shot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
