<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All the excitement over 435 last weekend with the three CN North America painted units got me thinking of other times when I&#8217;ve seen solid consists of &#8220;CNNA&#8221; units.  I recall an early 90&#8242;s consist with a GP40-2L(W) and two SD40us at Bayview, and a pair of C44-9W on 148 at Brantford.  I&#8217;m sure there were others.  This consist in Fort Erie with three different models in CNNA paint is probably the best example I&#8217;ve got.  The reverse move in the yard with no cars provided a nice opportunity to photograph the consist in favourable light.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/all-the-excitement-over-435-last-weekend-with-the-three-cn-north-america-painted-units-got-me-thinking-of-other-times-when-ive-seen-solid-consists-of-cnna-units-i-recall-an-early-90s-consist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 01:52:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43598#comment-43526</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 20:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DSC_3611m.jpg#comment-43526</guid>
		<description>Nobody cared in 2007.. they were just another CN train of boring CN units.

Everyone wanted the foreign power, much of which is now gone off the foreign rosters..

and so few people chased trains, because the next one was probably just as good as the last..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody cared in 2007.. they were just another CN train of boring CN units.</p>
<p>Everyone wanted the foreign power, much of which is now gone off the foreign rosters..</p>
<p>and so few people chased trains, because the next one was probably just as good as the last..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43598#comment-43518</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DSC_3611m.jpg#comment-43518</guid>
		<description>Yes awesome for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes awesome for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Flood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43598#comment-43505</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Flood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 22:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DSC_3611m.jpg#comment-43505</guid>
		<description>Definitely by today&#039;s standards this is extremely foam-worthy. But I wonder how many railfanners took this for granted in 2007?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely by today&#8217;s standards this is extremely foam-worthy. But I wonder how many railfanners took this for granted in 2007?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mberry</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43598#comment-43504</link>
		<dc:creator>mberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 21:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DSC_3611m.jpg#comment-43504</guid>
		<description>Wow, awesome lashup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, awesome lashup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43598#comment-43502</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 19:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DSC_3611m.jpg#comment-43502</guid>
		<description>Oooooooh nice

Imagine the foam for that today eh Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooooooh nice</p>
<p>Imagine the foam for that today eh Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43598#comment-43498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 16:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DSC_3611m.jpg#comment-43498</guid>
		<description>Well, today it&#039;s exciting. I despised this scheme when it debuted, because it marked the end of the zebra stripe scheme. I got over it, but I still think an SD70i in zebra would be pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, today it&#8217;s exciting. I despised this scheme when it debuted, because it marked the end of the zebra stripe scheme. I got over it, but I still think an SD70i in zebra would be pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
