<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An ALCO!  If only it truly were.  CN A42131-03 waits on the north track at Georgetown with schnabel car BBCX 1000, while on the south track, CN M39931-03 passes by with 694 axles this fine summer&#8217;s day.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/an-alco-if-only-it-truly-were-cn-a42131-03-waits-on-the-north-track-at-georgetown-with-schnabel-car-bbcx-1000-while-on-the-south-track-cn-m39931-03-passes-by-with-694-axles-this-fine-summers-d/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 20:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-16314</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-16314</guid>
		<description>I know this is 399 as it is one of my favorite trains on the CN even though I catch multiple GEVOs on it some days, and I am wrong it came on 384 that morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is 399 as it is one of my favorite trains on the CN even though I catch multiple GEVOs on it some days, and I am wrong it came on 384 that morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15813</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 23:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15813</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tim!  Corrections are always appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim!  Corrections are always appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15812</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 22:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15812</guid>
		<description>For whatever it&#039;s worth, this was L42131 03. A42131 03 was the regular Mac Yard-Port Robinson train in the morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For whatever it&#8217;s worth, this was L42131 03. A42131 03 was the regular Mac Yard-Port Robinson train in the morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15775</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments guys.

@CNSD60F: the train radioed in as 399; and 399 is a westbound.  Are you sure you didn&#039;t see 398, which would have been an eastbound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments guys.</p>
<p>@CNSD60F: the train radioed in as 399; and 399 is a westbound.  Are you sure you didn&#8217;t see 398, which would have been an eastbound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15768</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15768</guid>
		<description>Sunday* and it was at Brampton around 9:40 AM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunday* and it was at Brampton around 9:40 AM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15767</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15767</guid>
		<description>I saw the 399 lash-up on Subday with 8838 leading the bunch. Was not even smoky! I am guessing the train was M398</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the 399 lash-up on Subday with 8838 leading the bunch. Was not even smoky! I am guessing the train was M398</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris van der Heide</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15765</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris van der Heide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15765</guid>
		<description>The old guy in the black shirt was just some local kicking around the station for the afternoon. Not sure who the guy with the low level tripod setup was.

There was another half dozen of us in the photo line with Jacob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old guy in the black shirt was just some local kicking around the station for the afternoon. Not sure who the guy with the low level tripod setup was.</p>
<p>There was another half dozen of us in the photo line with Jacob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15761</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15761</guid>
		<description>Would the two guys in the shot be Chris judging from the vantage point of this one: http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25240</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would the two guys in the shot be Chris judging from the vantage point of this one: <a href="http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25240" rel="nofollow">http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25240</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15745</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15745</guid>
		<description>Now there is a nice action shot. Something of everything. Good work !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now there is a nice action shot. Something of everything. Good work !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25232#comment-15738</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 02:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/195.jpg#comment-15738</guid>
		<description>Nice work Jacob. I had prior engagements so the action at Georgetown had to wait.

Glad you were there and you did very well! Again great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work Jacob. I had prior engagements so the action at Georgetown had to wait.</p>
<p>Glad you were there and you did very well! Again great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
