<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An eastbound timetable freight works from Parkdale Yard work sits way along the Don Branch section of the Belleville Sub, just north of the Bloor viaduct.Scan and editing by Jacob Patterson.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/an-eastbound-timetable-freight-works-from-parkdale-yard-work-sits-way-along-the-don-branch-section-of-the-belleville-sub-just-north-of-the-bloor-viaduct-scan-and-editing-by-jacob-patterson/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 01:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54356#comment-60910</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 16:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/JF_1476_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-60910</guid>
		<description>What an awesome shot! I have passed these tracks and gone under them on CN&#039;s Bala Sub, more times then I can count. It is fantastic to finally see a train on these tracks,especially with an MLW consist. There was a time that GO transit thought about using these tracks once more. They laid ribbon rail from CN Oriole on the Bala Sub to connect with CP&#039;s Belleville Sub at Leaside. Sadly it did not happen and the tracks were all ripped out and today is a bike trail. Oh what could have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an awesome shot! I have passed these tracks and gone under them on CN&#8217;s Bala Sub, more times then I can count. It is fantastic to finally see a train on these tracks,especially with an MLW consist. There was a time that GO transit thought about using these tracks once more. They laid ribbon rail from CN Oriole on the Bala Sub to connect with CP&#8217;s Belleville Sub at Leaside. Sadly it did not happen and the tracks were all ripped out and today is a bike trail. Oh what could have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrDan</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54356#comment-60905</link>
		<dc:creator>MrDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 17:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/JF_1476_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-60905</guid>
		<description>The wide fuel/water tanks hint that both RS10&#039;s are dual-service units.

Excellent photo John, in a unique location!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wide fuel/water tanks hint that both RS10&#8242;s are dual-service units.</p>
<p>Excellent photo John, in a unique location!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flangeway</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54356#comment-60900</link>
		<dc:creator>Flangeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 19:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/JF_1476_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-60900</guid>
		<description>The third unit is an RS18. You can tell by the orientation of the paint. You are correct that CP RS10 units were set up to run long hood forward, while RS18s were set up to run short hood forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The third unit is an RS18. You can tell by the orientation of the paint. You are correct that CP RS10 units were set up to run long hood forward, while RS18s were set up to run short hood forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54356#comment-60899</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 18:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/JF_1476_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-60899</guid>
		<description>@Flangeway I believe you are correct. The RS10&#039;s, and surely not RS18&#039;s, were not meant to be run long forward were they? So another reason for a great photo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Flangeway I believe you are correct. The RS10&#8242;s, and surely not RS18&#8242;s, were not meant to be run long forward were they? So another reason for a great photo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jknott86</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54356#comment-60898</link>
		<dc:creator>jknott86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/JF_1476_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-60898</guid>
		<description>wonderful photo, john.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonderful photo, john.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flangeway</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54356#comment-60896</link>
		<dc:creator>Flangeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 16:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/JF_1476_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-60896</guid>
		<description>Yes, this is a great photo for sure. The locomotives in the classic maroon and grey look to be two RS10s and an RS18 trailing. The lead unit is dual service, and you can see the CPR beaver shield on its long hood face, denoting that it is or was used in passenger service. This is classic CPR in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is a great photo for sure. The locomotives in the classic maroon and grey look to be two RS10s and an RS18 trailing. The lead unit is dual service, and you can see the CPR beaver shield on its long hood face, denoting that it is or was used in passenger service. This is classic CPR in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54356#comment-60889</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 11:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/JF_1476_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-60889</guid>
		<description>Very nice! Nothing like the long nose forward MLW RS2/3&#039;s that were supposed to run that way. I didn&#039;t know they had the tall fence on the bridge in 64.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! Nothing like the long nose forward MLW RS2/3&#8242;s that were supposed to run that way. I didn&#8217;t know they had the tall fence on the bridge in 64.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
