http://www.railpictures.ca The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh? Mon, 11 May 2026 14:21:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18264#comment-8520 MichaelDelic Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:31:38 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CN-7081.jpg#comment-8520 Thanks Tim, I figured that may have been the case. I had heard RTC refer to them as an extra 546. Thanks Tim, I figured that may have been the case. I had heard RTC refer to them as an extra 546.

]]> http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18264#comment-8516 Tim Stevens Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:49:13 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CN-7081.jpg#comment-8516 Cool, this move was (somewhat) properly symbolled "L54632 28" as a second section. It probably should've been called L54630 28, but hey, at least somebody was trying. Cool, this move was (somewhat) properly symbolled “L54632 28″ as a second section. It probably should’ve been called L54630 28, but hey, at least somebody was trying.

]]>