<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another one of those gloomy days, but if the sun had been out, it would have been right in my face. Quite the lashup on WC #11, WC 6632, 6614, FRV 1702, WC 6588, 6604, 6655, 3012 and 6506 northbound about 15 miles out of Hawk Jct. on the  former ACR line, which was taken over by WC in 1995 which in turn was taken over by CN in 2001. I believe the lead unit is in MKCX paint; the third unit is Fox River Valley.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/another-one-of-those-gloomy-days-but-if-the-sun-had-been-out-it-would-have-been-right-in-my-face-quite-the-lashup-on-wc-11-wc-6632-6614-frv-1702-wc-6588-6604-6655-3012-and-6506-northbound-a/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 02:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: headtailgrep</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=9336#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>headtailgrep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/WC-6632-at-Perry-ON2.jpg#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>A decision to satisfy the Editors - we felt a lot of people would enjoy it but some will call into question this or that - it&#039;s the nature of a site like this - trying to please everyone while maintaining a high quality experience ;) (And yes, editors must also be satisfied)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A decision to satisfy the Editors &#8211; we felt a lot of people would enjoy it but some will call into question this or that &#8211; it&#8217;s the nature of a site like this &#8211; trying to please everyone while maintaining a high quality experience <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  (And yes, editors must also be satisfied)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdntrainphotog</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=9336#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Cdntrainphotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/WC-6632-at-Perry-ON2.jpg#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>Why would the Editors put that note on the picture. It is a good picture of an interesting subject. It is far better and far, far more interesting than many of the pictures on this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the Editors put that note on the picture. It is a good picture of an interesting subject. It is far better and far, far more interesting than many of the pictures on this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
