<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As a second example of the astonishing level of detail in the Archibald Murchie glass negative of Keefers recently posted (http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54515), consider this extreme crop to another group of cars near the depot.

Probably stored tipped to avoid accumulating precipitation, those side-dump cars are something never seen before, simple predecessors of the air-dumps common today.

The nine people facing the camera are likely a significant part of the population of Keefers, which was probably still known as Keefer’s in those days.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/as-a-second-example-of-the-astonishing-level-of-detail-in-the-archibald-murchie-glass-negative-of-keefers-recently-posted-httpwww-railpictures-caattachment_id54515-consider-this-extreme-crop/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54519#comment-61151</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 14:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/1890s_cp-keefers-glass-negative_archibald-murchie_3200-dpi-cropped-1920x1117-pixels1.jpeg#comment-61151</guid>
		<description>Wow. I definitely think they were told a photo will be taken and all lined up for the shot. I imagine they all knew that the exposure time was rather long too.. 

from what I understand the exposure time was in minutes not seconds for glass plate negatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I definitely think they were told a photo will be taken and all lined up for the shot. I imagine they all knew that the exposure time was rather long too.. </p>
<p>from what I understand the exposure time was in minutes not seconds for glass plate negatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
