<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As the traffic increased on the VIA Chatham Subdivision, I wasn&#8217;t too lucky at first in catching some of the rerouted trains due to the derailment in the Sarnia tunnel. I had seen some of the photos posted by other railfans who came to Chatham from afar, just to catch a glimpse of the action. Finally, some luck after a great tip by a fellow rp.ca contributor. Here, CN 367 leads it train past the station with leased 2033 in tow.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/as-the-traffic-increased-on-the-via-chatham-subdivision-i-wasnt-too-lucky-at-first-in-catching-some-of-the-rerouted-trains-due-to-the-derailment-in-the-sarnia-tunnel-i-had-seen-some-of-the-photos/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:03:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38271#comment-34107</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CN-324-Reroute.jpg#comment-34107</guid>
		<description>The leader is grubby alright, but at least the paint stays on.....unlike some of those ugly SD75I units that still wander around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leader is grubby alright, but at least the paint stays on&#8230;..unlike some of those ugly SD75I units that still wander around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Steinman</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38271#comment-34098</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Steinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 21:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CN-324-Reroute.jpg#comment-34098</guid>
		<description>Hi all...

@BradKetchen...I believe it is the same units, although can&#039;t confirm what CN unit was included with 2033 on the point.

@Stephen C. Host...thank you. Thought there were more reroute photos on rp.ca, but realized they were posted in other Facebook groups. 

@Larry Parks - yes, dirty. Almost looks like it traveled off the beaten path a little lol. I actually have a VIA unit that is absolutely covered in grime. May try and post that here sometime. Looks like it went off-roading, and through a large pool of mud. LOL :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all&#8230;</p>
<p>@BradKetchen&#8230;I believe it is the same units, although can&#8217;t confirm what CN unit was included with 2033 on the point.</p>
<p>@Stephen C. Host&#8230;thank you. Thought there were more reroute photos on rp.ca, but realized they were posted in other Facebook groups. </p>
<p>@Larry Parks &#8211; yes, dirty. Almost looks like it traveled off the beaten path a little lol. I actually have a VIA unit that is absolutely covered in grime. May try and post that here sometime. Looks like it went off-roading, and through a large pool of mud. LOL <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38271#comment-34093</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 20:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CN-324-Reroute.jpg#comment-34093</guid>
		<description>That is a dirty 2837. It looks like it has been on a back road re-route. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a dirty 2837. It looks like it has been on a back road re-route. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38271#comment-34091</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CN-324-Reroute.jpg#comment-34091</guid>
		<description>Glad you shared some reroute photos. I was expecting a few more on here and it was sparse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you shared some reroute photos. I was expecting a few more on here and it was sparse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38271#comment-34090</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 10:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CN-324-Reroute.jpg#comment-34090</guid>
		<description>Is this the same train with 2033 in the lead on your other photo? Very nice TOdd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same train with 2033 in the lead on your other photo? Very nice TOdd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
