<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Before going to Ontario Southland Railway the F&#8217;s were employed by the GEXR, 1400 and 1401 at the shop in Goderich, I don&#8217;t think they ran in a pair like this very often on GEXR as there was usually another unit on one end or the other leaving the F&#8217;s in the middle of the consist. They didn&#8217;t last all that long on GEXR and both went out of service before OSR picked them up.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/before-going-to-ontario-southland-railway-the-fs-were-employed-by-the-gexr-1400-and-1401-at-the-shop-in-goderich-i-dont-think-they-ran-in-a-pair-like-this-very-often-on-gexr-as-there-was-usually/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 15:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56274#comment-63997</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/100_8315.jpg#comment-63997</guid>
		<description>April 18 2003

431 was 1401-4001-4096-4019-6537-3821-4046.   

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April 18 2003</p>
<p>431 was 1401-4001-4096-4019-6537-3821-4046.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56274#comment-63996</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 23:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/100_8315.jpg#comment-63996</guid>
		<description>1400 had the compressor issues on OSR. So as long as one unit had it.... it could be in the consist

431/2 had the f unit at least once. And it led. It was a 7 or 8 unit train too.

And let&#039;s ignore the times 431 ran west to Goderich from stratford. Which happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1400 had the compressor issues on OSR. So as long as one unit had it&#8230;. it could be in the consist</p>
<p>431/2 had the f unit at least once. And it led. It was a 7 or 8 unit train too.</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s ignore the times 431 ran west to Goderich from stratford. Which happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrDan</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56274#comment-63992</link>
		<dc:creator>MrDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/100_8315.jpg#comment-63992</guid>
		<description>I recall one got laid up with a bent rear drawbar, and the other had a bad compressor necessitating it always running with something else. They always seemed to stay on local runs, often with RLK 4001, I don&#039;t think they ever ran on 431/432.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall one got laid up with a bent rear drawbar, and the other had a bad compressor necessitating it always running with something else. They always seemed to stay on local runs, often with RLK 4001, I don&#8217;t think they ever ran on 431/432.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
