<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Between showers on a summer afternoon in 1963, train No. 646 from Niagara Falls and Hamilton handles express traffic at Burlington. If the train was on time, it&#8217;s 3:29 PM and the train will arrive in Toronto at 4:15 PM. Note the fruit on the baggage carts, visitors in the cab of the RDC, the train order semaphores and the &#8220;flag stop&#8221; lights on the mast of the train order signal. If you look closely, you can also see the van of a CP train in the distance. My, how times have changed&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/between-showers-on-a-summer-afternoon-in-1963-train-no-646-from-niagara-falls-and-hamilton-handles-express-traffic-at-burlington-if-the-train-was-on-time-its-329-pm-and-the-train-will-arrive-in/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39130</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 00:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39130</guid>
		<description>Ok ok..haha...rules might have been the wrong word. More like the traditional wedgie shot with sun behind photographer etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok ok..haha&#8230;rules might have been the wrong word. More like the traditional wedgie shot with sun behind photographer etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: railwayguy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39118</link>
		<dc:creator>railwayguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39118</guid>
		<description>Curious, what are the standard photography rules ? Must have missed reading them back in 1952. Although I guess one rule back then was you needed day,ight. And with my Hop-long-Cassidy box camera, it helped if the subject was still, or at least moving slowly. Other than that, it was “point and shoot”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious, what are the standard photography rules ? Must have missed reading them back in 1952. Although I guess one rule back then was you needed day,ight. And with my Hop-long-Cassidy box camera, it helped if the subject was still, or at least moving slowly. Other than that, it was “point and shoot”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39102</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39102</guid>
		<description>Seems odd that 646 would be taking on this L.C.L. business. There&#039;s a lot of baskets and boxes to be loaded in the normal station stop timeframe. 
Likely all from the long-gone market gardens that populated the farmland along Maple Avenue, now just a concrete wasteland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems odd that 646 would be taking on this L.C.L. business. There&#8217;s a lot of baskets and boxes to be loaded in the normal station stop timeframe.<br />
Likely all from the long-gone market gardens that populated the farmland along Maple Avenue, now just a concrete wasteland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39101</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39101</guid>
		<description>Rules ?
For photography...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rules ?<br />
For photography&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39098</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39098</guid>
		<description>I like how this photo breaks a lot of the standard photography rules however it still looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how this photo breaks a lot of the standard photography rules however it still looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harricottbay</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39064</link>
		<dc:creator>harricottbay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39064</guid>
		<description>A great shot! Probably one of the first in the ‘New Image’, note the old scheme still on the rear unit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great shot! Probably one of the first in the ‘New Image’, note the old scheme still on the rear unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: railwayguy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39054</link>
		<dc:creator>railwayguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39054</guid>
		<description>Very, very nice picture Doug, well done !  Neat lighting and reflection on the platform, and CN employees at work. Brings back many a good memory. Too bad VIA didn’t keep CN Express and partnered say with UPS .
Thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very, very nice picture Doug, well done !  Neat lighting and reflection on the platform, and CN employees at work. Brings back many a good memory. Too bad VIA didn’t keep CN Express and partnered say with UPS .<br />
Thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mile27</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=41027#comment-39041</link>
		<dc:creator>mile27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CNd200646-Burlington-Sept1963.jpg#comment-39041</guid>
		<description>Wonderful image, Doug. Simpler times, sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful image, Doug. Simpler times, sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
