<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: By 1995, CN detours on the Guelph Subdivision were infrequent but they did occur. For whatever reason, CN 383 took the long way to London over the Guelph Subdivision during a late April day.  The westbound is pictured at Petersburg with CN 5345, CN 6106 and LMSX 718. CN SD40-2 6106, nee-UP 4106 would eventually become CN 5373 later in 1995 after being remanufactured by AMF in Montreal, Quebec.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/by-1995-cn-detours-on-the-guelph-subdivision-were-infrequent-but-they-did-occur-for-whatever-reason-cn-383-took-the-long-way-to-london-over-the-guelph-subdivision-during-a-late-april-day-the-west/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 12:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=48066#comment-50748</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CN383@PetersburgVersion6.jpg#comment-50748</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments. 

The remember the passenger trains would regularly meet here in the siding during the mid-90&#039;s. I&#039;m not sure how long the team track lasted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments. </p>
<p>The remember the passenger trains would regularly meet here in the siding during the mid-90&#8242;s. I&#8217;m not sure how long the team track lasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=48066#comment-50740</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CN383@PetersburgVersion6.jpg#comment-50740</guid>
		<description>Thank you. Looks like both are used in 1995.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Looks like both are used in 1995.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfriedrich</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=48066#comment-50738</link>
		<dc:creator>jfriedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 02:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CN383@PetersburgVersion6.jpg#comment-50738</guid>
		<description>According to the Car Control info I have from 1985, the tracks at Petersburg were a team track and a passing track. No specific industry/customer indicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Car Control info I have from 1985, the tracks at Petersburg were a team track and a passing track. No specific industry/customer indicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=48066#comment-50737</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 01:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CN383@PetersburgVersion6.jpg#comment-50737</guid>
		<description>What was all this track for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was all this track for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
