<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christmas season creates interesting consists&#8230;


The Engineman is awaiting the light controlled by the TTR Scott Street Leverman,


with an all CN lash up, likely off a Windsor VIA train, (unlikely a 9500 series would lead on the Kingston Sub)., 


Given three units plus a steam generator, the conventional consist had to be 13 plus cars&#8230;.


GMD 1974 built GP40-2L(W), CN #9425, geared for 65 mph


MLW 1960 built RS-18m (modified circa 1967 for Tempo service) CN #3153, geared for 80 mph


MLW 1959 built RS-18, CN #3113, geared for 80 mph


At TTR Jarvis Street, December 28, 1980 Kodachrome by S.Danko</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/christmas-season-creates-interesting-consists-the-engineman-is-awaiting-the-light-controlled-by-the-ttr-scott-street-levermanwith-an-all-cn-lash-up-likely-off-a-windsor-via-train/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=55738#comment-66570</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/img615-2-1280x805.jpg#comment-66570</guid>
		<description>Stephen, CN 9400-9449 were geared for 80mph per 1984 Trackside Guide. I would think as protection power for passenger trains given that CN was still operating them when these units were built. I recall seeing CN 9444 or 9449 westbound through Newtonville in the mid-90&#039;s leading a Via, though not sure if still geared for 80mph.

If the passenger train is dead in the water, a 65mph geared freight unit is still better than 0mph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, CN 9400-9449 were geared for 80mph per 1984 Trackside Guide. I would think as protection power for passenger trains given that CN was still operating them when these units were built. I recall seeing CN 9444 or 9449 westbound through Newtonville in the mid-90&#8242;s leading a Via, though not sure if still geared for 80mph.</p>
<p>If the passenger train is dead in the water, a 65mph geared freight unit is still better than 0mph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=55738#comment-63124</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2024 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/img615-2-1280x805.jpg#comment-63124</guid>
		<description>This is unreal. If 9425 was geard for 65, does that mean they were delayed getting into Toronto? perhaps a rescue engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unreal. If 9425 was geard for 65, does that mean they were delayed getting into Toronto? perhaps a rescue engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
