<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CLC built six of these CPA-16-5 passenger locos for CN along with six CPB-16-5 &#8220;B&#8221; units. They were 1600hp and geared for 83 mph.  Due to the low number on the roster, it was not too common to find one leading on a passenger train.  CN 6702 on train 146 has passed through the interlocking at Hamilton West (now called Bayview) and will head onto the Oakville Sub toward Toronto.  Note the wheel stops for the siding which no longer exists.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/clc-built-six-of-these-cpa-16-5-passenger-locos-for-cn-along-with-six-cpb-16-5-b-units-they-were-1600hp-and-geared-for-83-mph-due-to-the-low-number-on-the-roster-it-was-not-too-common-to-find/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35044#comment-29250</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 13:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN6702_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29250</guid>
		<description>I think CN had Westinghouse electrics which were not as reliable as the GE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CN had Westinghouse electrics which were not as reliable as the GE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrDan</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35044#comment-29246</link>
		<dc:creator>MrDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 03:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN6702_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29246</guid>
		<description>Lotta great shots you&#039;re uploading Dave!

According to Dean &amp; Hanna&#039;s CP bible, the CP H-liners had the GE electrical system (that they preferred), while CP&#039;s C-liner units ordered earlier had Westinghouse electricals. No mention of what CN&#039;s units had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lotta great shots you&#8217;re uploading Dave!</p>
<p>According to Dean &#038; Hanna&#8217;s CP bible, the CP H-liners had the GE electrical system (that they preferred), while CP&#8217;s C-liner units ordered earlier had Westinghouse electricals. No mention of what CN&#8217;s units had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRR5406</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35044#comment-29179</link>
		<dc:creator>PRR5406</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 11:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN6702_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29179</guid>
		<description>All FM power suffered from electrical issue.  What was worse involve tearing down the prime movers.  Still, if you&#039;re not running steam, it might as well be FM C-Liners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All FM power suffered from electrical issue.  What was worse involve tearing down the prime movers.  Still, if you&#8217;re not running steam, it might as well be FM C-Liners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35044#comment-29174</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN6702_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29174</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe they were all that reliable either which would contribute to a short life.  The H16-44&#039;s suffered a short life also with electrical problem if I recall correctly.  CP&#039;s H16-44&#039;s were more reliable as they had a different manufacturer for the electrical system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe they were all that reliable either which would contribute to a short life.  The H16-44&#8242;s suffered a short life also with electrical problem if I recall correctly.  CP&#8217;s H16-44&#8242;s were more reliable as they had a different manufacturer for the electrical system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Redburn</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35044#comment-29172</link>
		<dc:creator>George Redburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN6702_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29172</guid>
		<description>Those were the days</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were the days</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp4pix</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35044#comment-29168</link>
		<dc:creator>jp4pix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN6702_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29168</guid>
		<description>Great image of a rare locomotive.  My Canadian Trackside Guide indicates CPA16-5 CN 6700-6705 built 1954-55, retired between 1967 and 1969. So yes, nearing end of service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great image of a rare locomotive.  My Canadian Trackside Guide indicates CPA16-5 CN 6700-6705 built 1954-55, retired between 1967 and 1969. So yes, nearing end of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake2</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35044#comment-29154</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN6702_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29154</guid>
		<description>That CLC must have been close to the end of its short life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That CLC must have been close to the end of its short life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
