<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN 1321 is crossing the CP diamond at Inglewood in this July 1960 photo. I&#8217;m guessing this is Barrie to Hamilton train 662 which was due at Inglewood about 6 pm.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-1321-is-crossing-the-cp-diamond-at-inglewood-in-this-july-1960-photo-im-guessing-this-is-barrie-to-hamilton-train-662-which-was-due-at-inglewood-about-6-pm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhately</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-16833</link>
		<dc:creator>dhately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-16833</guid>
		<description>runeight has a sharp eye and noticed the white flags on the 1321. Since 1321 is replacing D1 which had broken down, I&#039;d guess the flags got overlooked in the rush. This would be a regular train as passenger service had a couple of months to go on this line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>runeight has a sharp eye and noticed the white flags on the 1321. Since 1321 is replacing D1 which had broken down, I&#8217;d guess the flags got overlooked in the rush. This would be a regular train as passenger service had a couple of months to go on this line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runeight</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-16820</link>
		<dc:creator>runeight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-16820</guid>
		<description>Just saw this picture and totally agree, excellent stuff !  Indeed it is Inglewood and yes, she&#039;s southbound, but why the &quot; extra flags &quot; ?  One possible explanation --- passenger service ended at Inglewood on Oct.29 1960.  Is this the southbound equipment move back to Hamilton the next day ?   That would have been a good reason for Clayton to be there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw this picture and totally agree, excellent stuff !  Indeed it is Inglewood and yes, she&#8217;s southbound, but why the &#8221; extra flags &#8221; ?  One possible explanation &#8212; passenger service ended at Inglewood on Oct.29 1960.  Is this the southbound equipment move back to Hamilton the next day ?   That would have been a good reason for Clayton to be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14936</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 19:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14936</guid>
		<description>Inglewood is still a nice place to make memories, and that house at far left is still standing.

http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24190

Now.. if one was to build a station at Inglewod.. we now have photos to go by :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inglewood is still a nice place to make memories, and that house at far left is still standing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24190" rel="nofollow">http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24190</a></p>
<p>Now.. if one was to build a station at Inglewod.. we now have photos to go by <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14931</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14931</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. While a disappointment at the time surely this would have been a rare thing though on this line.. a conventional train.

Julian Bernard has said very similar notes about a train he posted a couple weeks ago.. they were to go shoot a self propelled doodlebug only to find a conventional train with Steam..

Photos that now have turned into absolute gems!

Thanks for sharing guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. While a disappointment at the time surely this would have been a rare thing though on this line.. a conventional train.</p>
<p>Julian Bernard has said very similar notes about a train he posted a couple weeks ago.. they were to go shoot a self propelled doodlebug only to find a conventional train with Steam..</p>
<p>Photos that now have turned into absolute gems!</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhately</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14930</link>
		<dc:creator>dhately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 02:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14930</guid>
		<description>Clayton tells me he and a couple of friends were planning to get a photo of one of a kind rebuilt streamlined oil-electric D1, which was a regular on this run. It had broken down and was replaced by the 1321.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clayton tells me he and a couple of friends were planning to get a photo of one of a kind rebuilt streamlined oil-electric D1, which was a regular on this run. It had broken down and was replaced by the 1321.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhately</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14920</link>
		<dc:creator>dhately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 22:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14920</guid>
		<description>The public timetable I referred to shows 662-663 operating from Barrie to Allandale, Vine, Thornton, Cookstown, Randall, Beeton, Tottenham, Palgrave, Albion, Caledon East,and Georgetown where I&#039;m guessing it becomes westbound 663 to Milton, Burlington, Aldershot and Hamilton. 93 miles in 3 hours and 35 min.
Sounds like a splendid way to spend an evening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public timetable I referred to shows 662-663 operating from Barrie to Allandale, Vine, Thornton, Cookstown, Randall, Beeton, Tottenham, Palgrave, Albion, Caledon East,and Georgetown where I&#8217;m guessing it becomes westbound 663 to Milton, Burlington, Aldershot and Hamilton. 93 miles in 3 hours and 35 min.<br />
Sounds like a splendid way to spend an evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14913</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14913</guid>
		<description>My apologies, when i saw the words &quot;barrie to hamilton&quot; i knew this train would go on the beeton sub, which it could of done, or it took the newmarket sub to toronto and on the oakville, i am actually not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies, when i saw the words &#8220;barrie to hamilton&#8221; i knew this train would go on the beeton sub, which it could of done, or it took the newmarket sub to toronto and on the oakville, i am actually not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14912</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14912</guid>
		<description>Looks like the beeton sub</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the beeton sub</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14900</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 12:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14900</guid>
		<description>Great that you posted this, Clayton. Even better that you were there to see it. :o) As far as a 6PM train, well, rule of the railroad is to be late........and this looks like it was around 8PM or after, judging by the setting sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great that you posted this, Clayton. Even better that you were there to see it. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> ) As far as a 6PM train, well, rule of the railroad is to be late&#8230;&#8230;..and this looks like it was around 8PM or after, judging by the setting sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigandru</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24668#comment-14899</link>
		<dc:creator>craigandru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 03:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CN1321.jpg#comment-14899</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is really great to see.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is really great to see.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
