Comments on: CN 2514, one of the very few remaining C44-9WLs, is seen on point f what was this mornings 502. However, I wouldn’t catch this unit in action, as school time was right in the way. To make matters worse, the Hagersville subdivision runs right beside my school, so I had to resist the urge to run from class and see this beauty on the move. LOL! http://www.railpictures.ca The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh? Sun, 19 Apr 2026 02:46:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Aitch http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56349#comment-64142 Aitch Fri, 28 Mar 2025 18:27:30 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2514-3.jpg#comment-64142 @SCH: I hear you and I have to admit, when they came out in the 90’s I loathed them for the very reasons you described. But…. their stubby 4-window Canadian cab has grown on me over the years, especially compared to the countless GE models inundating the market that look like they’re made out of Lego (IMHO). I guess tastes change over the years. Ok, stepping down from the soapbox now. Here endeth the rant. ;-) @SCH: I hear you and I have to admit, when they came out in the 90’s I loathed them for the very reasons you described. But…. their stubby 4-window Canadian cab has grown on me over the years, especially compared to the countless GE models inundating the market that look like they’re made out of Lego (IMHO). I guess tastes change over the years. Ok, stepping down from the soapbox now. Here endeth the rant. ;-)

]]> By: Stephen C. Host http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56349#comment-64141 Stephen C. Host Fri, 28 Mar 2025 18:13:07 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2514-3.jpg#comment-64141 Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I'm glad someone sees these things as beautiful. But I think they are hideous. Remember too those of us who were around in the early 2000's or even the 90's - these were the units that we hated to see.... they displaced our beloved all EMD (and MLW) lashups. Happy face should work. :) you need to use : and ) together. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I’m glad someone sees these things as beautiful.

But I think they are hideous.

Remember too those of us who were around in the early 2000′s or even the 90′s – these were the units that we hated to see…. they displaced our beloved all EMD (and MLW) lashups.

Happy face should work. :) you need to use : and ) together.

]]> By: TRAINLOVER 7 http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56349#comment-64139 TRAINLOVER 7 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:55:09 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2514-3.jpg#comment-64139 Thank you very much Terry! Thank you very much Terry!

]]> By: TRAINLOVER 7 http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56349#comment-64138 TRAINLOVER 7 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:54:53 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2514-3.jpg#comment-64138 Sorry about the question marks, apperenlty the happy face doesn't work on here lol Sorry about the question marks, apperenlty the happy face doesn’t work on here lol

]]> By: TRAINLOVER 7 http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56349#comment-64137 TRAINLOVER 7 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:54:10 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2514-3.jpg#comment-64137 Thank you very much Aitch! Sure is a nice locomotive ???? Thank you very much Aitch! Sure is a nice locomotive ????

]]> By: terry.oshell http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56349#comment-64128 terry.oshell Thu, 27 Mar 2025 19:52:34 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2514-3.jpg#comment-64128 Very nice. Very nice.

]]> By: Aitch http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=56349#comment-64127 Aitch Thu, 27 Mar 2025 19:11:48 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2514-3.jpg#comment-64127 Nice composition ! I’m a big fan of this model too. ;-) Nice composition ! I’m a big fan of this model too. ;-)

]]>