<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN 2805 is only a few months old but has already lost its new GEVO shine as it leads 394 through Brantford on the north track.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-2805-is-only-a-few-months-old-but-has-already-lost-its-new-gevo-shine-as-it-leads-394-through-brantford-on-the-north-track/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 03:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLHH3403</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=13045#comment-4188</link>
		<dc:creator>RLHH3403</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/DSC_1136rpca.jpg#comment-4188</guid>
		<description>Rob, I didn&#039;t intend my comment to be snarky. My apologizes if it came off like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I didn&#8217;t intend my comment to be snarky. My apologizes if it came off like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=13045#comment-4187</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/DSC_1136rpca.jpg#comment-4187</guid>
		<description>Aivo - thanks for the snarky correction. I&#039;ll get db ed to correct the caption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aivo &#8211; thanks for the snarky correction. I&#8217;ll get db ed to correct the caption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLHH3403</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=13045#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator>RLHH3403</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/DSC_1136rpca.jpg#comment-4186</guid>
		<description>The road grim would make sense considering 2805 is already over a year old, having been delivered back in December 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The road grim would make sense considering 2805 is already over a year old, having been delivered back in December 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
