<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN 5293 is seen leading a set of light power on the Central Butte Sub through the north end of Moose Jaw Saskatchewan. There are no less than three bridges in town with similar paint jobs.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-5293-is-seen-leading-a-set-of-light-power-on-the-central-butte-sub-through-the-north-end-of-moose-jaw-saskatchewan-there-are-no-less-than-three-bridges-in-town-with-similar-paint-jobs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:51:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39293#comment-35493</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/DSC_4996.jpg#comment-35493</guid>
		<description>Nice Matt. You have a much better unit on the bridge than the big GE I caught on mine this summer. Checking CNRHA, they have photos of the other 2 bridges in town on their site. They refer to them as a type 6 &amp; 7 (they have a developed a system of types for the lettering). This bridge is listed as ?. I would call it a type 6a. It has all the characteristics of a type 6, it&#039;s because the span is shorter that &quot;courtesy and service&quot; was put underneath and a little smaller. I can appreciate the difficulty of getting a photo like this with good sun exposure on the bridge and a unit passing over it. :-)
CNRHA should give you a ring and add this beauty to their bridge collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Matt. You have a much better unit on the bridge than the big GE I caught on mine this summer. Checking CNRHA, they have photos of the other 2 bridges in town on their site. They refer to them as a type 6 &amp; 7 (they have a developed a system of types for the lettering). This bridge is listed as ?. I would call it a type 6a. It has all the characteristics of a type 6, it&#8217;s because the span is shorter that &#8220;courtesy and service&#8221; was put underneath and a little smaller. I can appreciate the difficulty of getting a photo like this with good sun exposure on the bridge and a unit passing over it. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
CNRHA should give you a ring and add this beauty to their bridge collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
