<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN 5470 brings up the rear of train 580 on their way to Hagersville.  On the head end was CN 9615 and CN 2444.  Over the last year since CN has taken back the Hagersville Sub there has been a wide variety of different locomotives to cross this bridge&#8230;I am certainly a fan of the SD60s.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-5470-brings-up-the-rear-of-train-580-on-their-way-to-hagersville-on-the-head-end-was-cn-9615-and-cn-2444-over-the-last-year-since-cn-has-taken-back-the-hagersville-sub-there-has-been-a-wide-var/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36491</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36491</guid>
		<description>I’m on the wrong side of the bridge for that Todd!  But I agree, a time machine shot could be done...I’ve got a few that may work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m on the wrong side of the bridge for that Todd!  But I agree, a time machine shot could be done&#8230;I’ve got a few that may work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Steinman</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36488</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Steinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36488</guid>
		<description>Great photo Joe! Nice to see CN running through Caledonia again, although I think you could have &quot;time machined&quot; this shot to a popular calendar cover that had the wonderful old F units crossing. Cant believe that with these bigger units they are still using a &#039;pusher&#039; lol :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photo Joe! Nice to see CN running through Caledonia again, although I think you could have &#8220;time machined&#8221; this shot to a popular calendar cover that had the wonderful old F units crossing. Cant believe that with these bigger units they are still using a &#8216;pusher&#8217; lol <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36442</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36442</guid>
		<description>I understand the not running around the train part the Jamie was talking about, just did not see the SBU :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the not running around the train part the Jamie was talking about, just did not see the SBU <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36438</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36438</guid>
		<description>There is indeed an SBU on 5470

Also what Jamie said, regarding running the unit on the tail end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is indeed an SBU on 5470</p>
<p>Also what Jamie said, regarding running the unit on the tail end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36437</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36437</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, can&#039;t tell if there is an SBU (marker) on the 5470? If they are moving at more than 15mph they need to have one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, can&#8217;t tell if there is an SBU (marker) on the 5470? If they are moving at more than 15mph they need to have one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jknott86</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36436</link>
		<dc:creator>jknott86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36436</guid>
		<description>Brad, so they wouldn&#039;t have to run around to the train in hagersville to then go back to work cgc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, so they wouldn&#8217;t have to run around to the train in hagersville to then go back to work cgc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36435</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36435</guid>
		<description>LOL@ Joey, just be lucky you did not have to operate one :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL@ Joey, just be lucky you did not have to operate one <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39754#comment-36427</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DSC_0884.jpg#comment-36427</guid>
		<description>What is the purpose of 5470 at the tail end? To avoid runaround moves or was it to be wyed at Caledonia? I recall G&amp;W some times had locomotives at either end servicng Ingenia on the Burford spur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the purpose of 5470 at the tail end? To avoid runaround moves or was it to be wyed at Caledonia? I recall G&amp;W some times had locomotives at either end servicng Ingenia on the Burford spur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
