<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN C-424&#8242;s 3222, 3226, 3224 are only a year old when this picture was taken.  They were manufactured by MLW in 1967.  The C-424&#8242;s survived as little as 11 years and as long as 22 years before retirement.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-c-424s-3222-3226-3224-are-only-a-year-old-when-this-picture-was-taken-they-were-manufactured-by-mlw-in-1967-the-c-424s-survived-as-little-as-11-years-and-as-long-as-22-years-before-retire/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28073#comment-24577</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC00050_RP.jpg#comment-24577</guid>
		<description>We can pretty much presume this is 407/307 or possibly 491, bound for Sarnia. No marshalling restrictions back then, just put the train together and get outa town !
All four of those little tank cars still have their wooden walkways, with the oldest looking to be from 1937/1942 era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can pretty much presume this is 407/307 or possibly 491, bound for Sarnia. No marshalling restrictions back then, just put the train together and get outa town !<br />
All four of those little tank cars still have their wooden walkways, with the oldest looking to be from 1937/1942 era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Courtney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28073#comment-19420</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC00050_RP.jpg#comment-19420</guid>
		<description>Love those C424s with the noodle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love those C424s with the noodle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28073#comment-19416</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC00050_RP.jpg#comment-19416</guid>
		<description>Thanks everyone for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 1014</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28073#comment-19411</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 1014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC00050_RP.jpg#comment-19411</guid>
		<description>The units in this picture and the one with the 3211 leading that you posted today are awesome. In addition though, the tank cars, I find, are just as great. The one just behind the units in this photo is a real dandy. I would love to see its built date, I&#039;m sure it will have been in service for a good number of years. Thanks for posting these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The units in this picture and the one with the 3211 leading that you posted today are awesome. In addition though, the tank cars, I find, are just as great. The one just behind the units in this photo is a real dandy. I would love to see its built date, I&#8217;m sure it will have been in service for a good number of years. Thanks for posting these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28073#comment-19370</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2017 03:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC00050_RP.jpg#comment-19370</guid>
		<description>Beautiful shot! I was never fond of this paint, compared to the stripes but a C424 looks great in any paint :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful shot! I was never fond of this paint, compared to the stripes but a C424 looks great in any paint <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28073#comment-19367</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 23:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC00050_RP.jpg#comment-19367</guid>
		<description>Dave&#039;s got cabin fever!  Thanks again for sharing some more of your fantastic photographs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave&#8217;s got cabin fever!  Thanks again for sharing some more of your fantastic photographs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
