<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN C40-8M 2417 is still earning its keep, leading loaded LPG train U761 west onto the south track at Park Gate.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-c40-8m-2417-is-still-earning-its-keep-leading-loaded-lpg-train-u761-west-onto-the-south-track-at-park-gate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43532#comment-43390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cn2417a.jpg#comment-43390</guid>
		<description>Transport Canada oversight at its best.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transport Canada oversight at its best&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43532#comment-43387</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cn2417a.jpg#comment-43387</guid>
		<description>@Dave Brook... nowadays if the entire train is made up of the same dangerous commodity and does not enter the US, a buffer car is not needed. Why? I would love to know... For example, if we were to run a crude oil train from Edmonton to Saint John and it stayed in Canada the whole way, it would not need a buffer. If this same train went via Chicago and Sarnia, it would. Crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave Brook&#8230; nowadays if the entire train is made up of the same dangerous commodity and does not enter the US, a buffer car is not needed. Why? I would love to know&#8230; For example, if we were to run a crude oil train from Edmonton to Saint John and it stayed in Canada the whole way, it would not need a buffer. If this same train went via Chicago and Sarnia, it would. Crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43532#comment-43386</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cn2417a.jpg#comment-43386</guid>
		<description>Still amazes me that ethanol needs a buffer car, but LPG doesn&#039;t. In the 80&#039;s, you needed 5 cars between the power  or van and an LPG car...of course, no unit ones in those days. Phil, do recall the rules for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still amazes me that ethanol needs a buffer car, but LPG doesn&#8217;t. In the 80&#8242;s, you needed 5 cars between the power  or van and an LPG car&#8230;of course, no unit ones in those days. Phil, do recall the rules for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43532#comment-43382</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cn2417a.jpg#comment-43382</guid>
		<description>Very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
