<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN HR616 #2102 has train #381 down to a crawl as it readies to negotiate the cross-overs at Chatham East on July 27, 1991.  The Chatham East Operator has hoop and orders in hand as the Brakeman on 381 leans down to snag them.  2102 will go through the cross-overs and diverge onto the CSX Sarnia Sub for it&#8217;s short run to Fargo, where the train will again turn west onto the CASO to finish out it&#8217;s run to Windsor.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-hr616-2102-has-train-381-down-to-a-crawl-as-it-readies-to-negotiate-the-cross-overs-at-chatham-east-on-july-27-1991-the-chatham-east-operator-has-hoop-and-orders-in-hand-as-the-brakeman-on-381/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 02:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=11441#comment-22135</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/19910727-CN2102-ChathamON.jpg#comment-22135</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I have the dates fuzzy in my mind, as to when the (new) rules, CROR, came into use. I was thinking it was late 1990 but maybe it was 1991...and train orders as we knew them ceased to exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I have the dates fuzzy in my mind, as to when the (new) rules, CROR, came into use. I was thinking it was late 1990 but maybe it was 1991&#8230;and train orders as we knew them ceased to exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chessie5730</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=11441#comment-22114</link>
		<dc:creator>Chessie5730</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/19910727-CN2102-ChathamON.jpg#comment-22114</guid>
		<description>I believe that was her name Bruce.  As for the T/O&#039;s, I assume they are for running over the C&amp;O to Fargo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that was her name Bruce.  As for the T/O&#8217;s, I assume they are for running over the C&amp;O to Fargo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=11441#comment-22071</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/19910727-CN2102-ChathamON.jpg#comment-22071</guid>
		<description>Is that Jennifer Waring ? And why are they still using train orders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that Jennifer Waring ? And why are they still using train orders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
