<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN L568 with 1439 in the lead switches the Kitchener yard on a sunny winter afternoon. The trailing units were GMTX&#8217;s 2279 and 2289.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-l568-with-1439-in-the-lead-switches-the-kitchener-yard-on-a-sunny-winter-afternoon-the-trailing-units-were-gmtxs-2279-and-2289/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 02:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=40708#comment-39217</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/CN-1439-Version-2.jpg#comment-39217</guid>
		<description>Yes, I see that as well now that you mention it Larry. Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I see that as well now that you mention it Larry. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=40708#comment-39155</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 21:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/CN-1439-Version-2.jpg#comment-39155</guid>
		<description>I see the 1439 received the same odd non-standard unit numbers under the cab window as the 1438. They must have been short on lettering supplies at the time. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the 1439 received the same odd non-standard unit numbers under the cab window as the 1438. They must have been short on lettering supplies at the time. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
