<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN M373 came around the bend at Lovekin with a surprise, two bright blue CEFX SD90&#8242;s, freshly outshopped from CADRail in Montréal. So naturally, a chase to the curve at Whitby was in order. CEFX 133, 118 are billed for Newton, IL and destined for the VTR in Vermont.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-m373-came-around-the-bend-at-lovekin-with-a-surprise-two-bright-blue-cefx-sd90s-freshly-outshopped-from-cadrail-in-montreal-so-naturally-a-chase-to-the-curve-at-whitby-was-in-order-cefx-133/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 17:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron A.</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=8831#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_5760-copy.jpg#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>Mike B: No clue, man. I&#039;m honestly basing the VTR info off assumption, as VTR has these units on roster, so I&#039;m guessing they sent 133, 118 for refurb? Not sure.

Mike L: Thanks, we thought so too, as many exclaimed at the Lovekin bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike B: No clue, man. I&#8217;m honestly basing the VTR info off assumption, as VTR has these units on roster, so I&#8217;m guessing they sent 133, 118 for refurb? Not sure.</p>
<p>Mike L: Thanks, we thought so too, as many exclaimed at the Lovekin bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=8831#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_5760-copy.jpg#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>Nice catch, Cam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catch, Cam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mberry</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=8831#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>mberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_5760-copy.jpg#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>Do you know why they&#039;re going to Illinois? From Montreal to Illinois then back to Vermont does not seem to make any sense!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know why they&#8217;re going to Illinois? From Montreal to Illinois then back to Vermont does not seem to make any sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
