<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN returns to Stratford West? Once CN took the Guelph sub back more signs have been put back up in the traditional CN style &#8211; unlike some other parts of Ontario where the new signs don&#8217;t exactly look prototypical (or shall I say Historically accurate, as once the signs are put up they are immediately prototype?) the Guelph sub signs are bloody nice looking. However.. I&#8217;m pretty sure Stratford West is new. Is it? Comment below. Either way three GP9&#8242;s leading this L568 brought me out and I chased to St. Marys and back.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-returns-to-stratford-west-once-cn-took-the-guelph-sub-back-more-signs-have-been-put-back-up-in-the-traditional-cn-style-unlike-some-other-parts-of-ontario-where-the-new-signs-dont-exactly-look/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 03:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cp5756</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49755#comment-53450</link>
		<dc:creator>cp5756</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 03:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/RPCA_568_STRSCH_6513.jpg#comment-53450</guid>
		<description>last unit appears to be 4790, nice stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last unit appears to be 4790, nice stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49755#comment-53424</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/RPCA_568_STRSCH_6513.jpg#comment-53424</guid>
		<description>It was already Cowie (no junction) when GEXR took lease of the Guelph Sub in November 1998. Prior to CN changing it to Cowie this location was known as Stratford Jct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was already Cowie (no junction) when GEXR took lease of the Guelph Sub in November 1998. Prior to CN changing it to Cowie this location was known as Stratford Jct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49755#comment-53422</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/RPCA_568_STRSCH_6513.jpg#comment-53422</guid>
		<description>What was it called prior to GEXR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was it called prior to GEXR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49755#comment-53419</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/RPCA_568_STRSCH_6513.jpg#comment-53419</guid>
		<description>Yes, the sign is new, because GEXR called the junction Cowie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the sign is new, because GEXR called the junction Cowie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
