<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN SW1200RS 1394 idles away the last day of 1996 in the Brantford yard. The following September, RaiLink Southern Ontario would takeover the operations in Brantford and area including the Burford Spur. In later years, CN 1394 would be repainted yellow and became the plant switcher in the CN steel facility at MacMillan yard in Toronto where it was re-lettered RT 110.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cn-sw1200rs-1394-idles-away-the-last-day-of-1996-in-the-brantford-yard-the-following-september-railink-southern-ontario-would-takeover-the-operations-in-brantford-and-area-including-the-burford-spur/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 05:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43578#comment-43470</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CN-1394-Version-6.jpg#comment-43470</guid>
		<description>I posted the 1508 just a while back. The stacks are almost twice the height on it. I knew they varied, the actual amount is much more than I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted the 1508 just a while back. The stacks are almost twice the height on it. I knew they varied, the actual amount is much more than I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43578#comment-43469</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CN-1394-Version-6.jpg#comment-43469</guid>
		<description>Thanks Brundle for the comment and note on the stacks. I had never noticed that on 1394 at all. Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brundle for the comment and note on the stacks. I had never noticed that on 1394 at all. Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=43578#comment-43457</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 21:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CN-1394-Version-6.jpg#comment-43457</guid>
		<description>The black CP hoppers make a good backdrop. :-) Nice low sun photo Jason.
Stacks are noticeably shorter on the 1394.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The black CP hoppers make a good backdrop. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Nice low sun photo Jason.<br />
Stacks are noticeably shorter on the 1394.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
