<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CN&#8217;s freight C-liners were relatively rare (only 23 CFA-16-4 and 3 CFB-16-4 units built from January 1952 until March 1953). The 9314, pictured here trailing RS-18s 3700 and 3804 on an eastbound at Bayview, was one of two units&#8211;9302 was the other&#8211;still shown on the roster in February 1967. (Information from Canadian National Railways Diesel Locomotives volume 1, published by the CNR Historical Association.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cns-freight-c-liners-were-relatively-rare-only-23-cfa-16-4-and-3-cfb-16-4-units-built-from-january-1952-until-march-1953-the-9314-pictured-here-trailing-rs-18s-3700-and-3804-on-an-eastbound-at-b/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrDan</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39726#comment-36405</link>
		<dc:creator>MrDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CN9314eb-Bayview-May1965.jpg#comment-36405</guid>
		<description>Steve, by the mid-late 60&#039;s CN was retiring their FM/CLC fleet, so their numbers were dwindling. I think they went to Pointe St. Charles to get their major components salvaged (engine, MG, TM&#039;s etc - the FM opposed-piston engines were popular in marine use), and the carbodies sent out for scrapping to places like the London reclamation yard.

One (CN 9344) was even sold to CP and sent to Ogden for rebuilding wrecked CP C-liner 4054, but the work was never done and CP scrapped both.

http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18682</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, by the mid-late 60&#8242;s CN was retiring their FM/CLC fleet, so their numbers were dwindling. I think they went to Pointe St. Charles to get their major components salvaged (engine, MG, TM&#8217;s etc &#8211; the FM opposed-piston engines were popular in marine use), and the carbodies sent out for scrapping to places like the London reclamation yard.</p>
<p>One (CN 9344) was even sold to CP and sent to Ogden for rebuilding wrecked CP C-liner 4054, but the work was never done and CP scrapped both.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18682" rel="nofollow">http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18682</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39726#comment-36383</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CN9314eb-Bayview-May1965.jpg#comment-36383</guid>
		<description>Ha wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First954</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39726#comment-36381</link>
		<dc:creator>First954</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CN9314eb-Bayview-May1965.jpg#comment-36381</guid>
		<description>Steve:  CN had 23 of them, but I worked two separate trips with the 9314.  The control stand had a huge broom stick for the throttle; must have been 3 feet long!  Fuse on back wall said &quot;mystery fuse, when fuse fails scrap unit&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve:  CN had 23 of them, but I worked two separate trips with the 9314.  The control stand had a huge broom stick for the throttle; must have been 3 feet long!  Fuse on back wall said &#8220;mystery fuse, when fuse fails scrap unit&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39726#comment-36380</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 02:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CN9314eb-Bayview-May1965.jpg#comment-36380</guid>
		<description>So cn only had two? Assume it was rare to find it.. let alone leading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So cn only had two? Assume it was rare to find it.. let alone leading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First954</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39726#comment-36379</link>
		<dc:creator>First954</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CN9314eb-Bayview-May1965.jpg#comment-36379</guid>
		<description>WOW 9314.  In the summer of 1967 I was working as a brakeman out of Capreol and worked this unit on two trips.  The first was on a Sudbury turn bringing back the CP auxiliary which CN used to help clear the Dunrankin collision.  We got back after dark.  The next morning I headed down to the shops, but the unit was gone!  That afternoon I was called for 301 which, at that time, was the long-haul to Hornepayne.  We had standard power of C424/GP40.  At Foleyet, we picked up two units.  Yep an RS-18 and 9314 trailing.  Lifted the units ahead of our incoming power and with no MU on the nose of the 9314, we limped all the way to Hornepayne.  Never did get a picture of it.  Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW 9314.  In the summer of 1967 I was working as a brakeman out of Capreol and worked this unit on two trips.  The first was on a Sudbury turn bringing back the CP auxiliary which CN used to help clear the Dunrankin collision.  We got back after dark.  The next morning I headed down to the shops, but the unit was gone!  That afternoon I was called for 301 which, at that time, was the long-haul to Hornepayne.  We had standard power of C424/GP40.  At Foleyet, we picked up two units.  Yep an RS-18 and 9314 trailing.  Lifted the units ahead of our incoming power and with no MU on the nose of the 9314, we limped all the way to Hornepayne.  Never did get a picture of it.  Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRR5406</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39726#comment-36378</link>
		<dc:creator>PRR5406</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CN9314eb-Bayview-May1965.jpg#comment-36378</guid>
		<description>Absolutely stunning line up of historic locomotives, especially (need I say it) the Fairbanks-Morse unit!  Great photo and correct CNR pain scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely stunning line up of historic locomotives, especially (need I say it) the Fairbanks-Morse unit!  Great photo and correct CNR pain scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kgmontreal</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39726#comment-36376</link>
		<dc:creator>kgmontreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CN9314eb-Bayview-May1965.jpg#comment-36376</guid>
		<description>Certainly brings back memories.  9314 was still operating during the summer of 1967 and I was lucky enough to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly brings back memories.  9314 was still operating during the summer of 1967 and I was lucky enough to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
