<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C&amp;O on the CASO.  Classic 4-axle power passing through Waterford on a cloudy day with remnants of the winter snow. Open tri-levels would become a thing of the past.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/co-on-the-caso-classic-4-axle-power-passing-through-waterford-on-a-cloudy-day-with-remnants-of-the-winter-snow-open-tri-levels-would-become-a-thing-of-the-past/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 03:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35129#comment-29380</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CO3569_1024-0368.jpg#comment-29380</guid>
		<description>I looked in the 1970 Employee Timetable and it appears that both freight and passenger were limited to 60mph from MP 67.5 to 68.5.   Waterford was MP 68.2 on the Buffalo to Chicago line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked in the 1970 Employee Timetable and it appears that both freight and passenger were limited to 60mph from MP 67.5 to 68.5.   Waterford was MP 68.2 on the Buffalo to Chicago line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35129#comment-29379</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2018 03:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CO3569_1024-0368.jpg#comment-29379</guid>
		<description>Steve, have a look here and see if you can figure it out. 
http://www.canadasouthern.com/caso/ett/images/tt-0466.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, have a look here and see if you can figure it out.<br />
<a href="http://www.canadasouthern.com/caso/ett/images/tt-0466.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadasouthern.com/caso/ett/images/tt-0466.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35129#comment-29376</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 23:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CO3569_1024-0368.jpg#comment-29376</guid>
		<description>What was the speed limit around the curve in Waterford? Curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the speed limit around the curve in Waterford? Curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
