<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CP 118 rolls through Lovekin with 9764-9732-6035-6040-6041. It was nice to see some SD40-2&#8242;s on the road again, even if they were offline.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cp-118-rolls-through-lovekin-with-9764-9732-6035-6040-6041-it-was-nice-to-see-some-sd40-2s-on-the-road-again-even-if-they-were-offline/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 13:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28289#comment-19763</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CP-9764-2.jpg#comment-19763</guid>
		<description>The 3 SD&#039;s are all remote equipped, could they be the ST.Paul hump units? Great catch Michael!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3 SD&#8217;s are all remote equipped, could they be the ST.Paul hump units? Great catch Michael!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trainguyMike</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28289#comment-19754</link>
		<dc:creator>trainguyMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CP-9764-2.jpg#comment-19754</guid>
		<description>@ Bill, I got that 140 last Sunday. GE&#039;s were 9588, 8571 upfront, 9819 &amp; 9783 &lt;--- were lifted in London. 

Nice one Delic ! btw, 6017 is on the Expressway again for tomorrow. tho I know its a night shot still right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bill, I got that 140 last Sunday. GE&#8217;s were 9588, 8571 upfront, 9819 &amp; 9783 &lt;&#8212; were lifted in London. </p>
<p>Nice one Delic ! btw, 6017 is on the Expressway again for tomorrow. tho I know its a night shot still right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelDelic</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28289#comment-19743</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelDelic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CP-9764-2.jpg#comment-19743</guid>
		<description>Thanks gentlemen. I believe these units are headed to CAD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks gentlemen. I believe these units are headed to CAD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Purdy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28289#comment-19739</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Purdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CP-9764-2.jpg#comment-19739</guid>
		<description>That train was CP 140 in Puslinch and had 2 different locomotives for power and 2 different pushing. Seven total.
Nice shot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That train was CP 140 in Puslinch and had 2 different locomotives for power and 2 different pushing. Seven total.<br />
Nice shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
