<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CP 8769, CP 8553 and SD9043MAC CP 9113 lead an eastbound through Lachine IMS yard, as a pair of GP9&#8242;s (CP 1690 &amp; an unknown mate) look on. Since then the GP9&#8242;s have all been retired and the SD9043MAC&#8217;s stored, unlikely to ever see service on CP again.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cp-8769-cp-8553-and-sd9043mac-cp-9113-lead-an-eastbound-through-lachine-ims-yard-as-a-pair-of-gp9s-cp-1690-an-unknown-mate-look-on-since-then-the-gp9s-have-all-been-retired-and-the-sd9/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driver8666</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30896#comment-23587</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver8666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6896.jpg#comment-23587</guid>
		<description>I remember when the 9043MAC&#039;s entered service on CP. Only one (I believe 9102) had cleared the Test House and was being towed to Toronto, the rest were still there for &quot;teething issues&quot;. But only 11 of them were built by GMD. The rest CP built from kits. This was 1999, when even seeing a GE in my words was rare. 

From what I know, crews didn&#039;t like it. The 4 H engined models were to become ACe&#039;s (through an exchange) back in 2004 or 2005, but CP didn&#039;t want them. They did test out CSX SD70ACe&#039;s but they could not handle the winters in Ontario. That&#039;s what I know. Someone out there could correct me on this one. CSX didn&#039;t order any after the 20 pre-production models. 

I&#039;m wondering if CP will order 70ACe-T4&#039;s? Given their current love affair with GE (same goes for the ET44AC), wonder if we will see the 70ACe-T4 on CP, that doesn&#039;t belong to another railroad. Sure they have the 20ECO&#039;s and the 30ECO&#039;s but those aren&#039;t new since they use recycled parts. On paper it looks &quot;new&quot; but if you ask me, it isin&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when the 9043MAC&#8217;s entered service on CP. Only one (I believe 9102) had cleared the Test House and was being towed to Toronto, the rest were still there for &#8220;teething issues&#8221;. But only 11 of them were built by GMD. The rest CP built from kits. This was 1999, when even seeing a GE in my words was rare. </p>
<p>From what I know, crews didn&#8217;t like it. The 4 H engined models were to become ACe&#8217;s (through an exchange) back in 2004 or 2005, but CP didn&#8217;t want them. They did test out CSX SD70ACe&#8217;s but they could not handle the winters in Ontario. That&#8217;s what I know. Someone out there could correct me on this one. CSX didn&#8217;t order any after the 20 pre-production models. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if CP will order 70ACe-T4&#8242;s? Given their current love affair with GE (same goes for the ET44AC), wonder if we will see the 70ACe-T4 on CP, that doesn&#8217;t belong to another railroad. Sure they have the 20ECO&#8217;s and the 30ECO&#8217;s but those aren&#8217;t new since they use recycled parts. On paper it looks &#8220;new&#8221; but if you ask me, it isin&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
