<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPR 1057.  The remains of a beautiful locomotive, sit silently at the South Simcoe Railway yard in Tottenham.  Presumably a part source for 136, this engine was retired because the engineer thought it was not a good engine to run (according to my sources).  RIP 1057.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cpr-1057-the-remains-of-a-beautiful-locomotive-sit-silently-at-the-south-simcoe-railway-yard-in-tottenham-presumably-a-part-source-for-136-this-engine-was-retired-because-the-engineer-thought-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19203#comment-9475</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/68.jpg#comment-9475</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this image, Jacob.  After so many years, it was great to see a shot of #1057!  I was inspired to search out and visit the South Simcoe Railway web site.  I was disappointed that I found very sparse information there.  Is it possible that someone knowledgeable with the current status of #1057 could provide an update?  I’m sure that I’m not the only viewer who is curious and interested.
  
Btw… I think it is Awesome to see some younger photographers submitting their work here on RPca!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this image, Jacob.  After so many years, it was great to see a shot of #1057!  I was inspired to search out and visit the South Simcoe Railway web site.  I was disappointed that I found very sparse information there.  Is it possible that someone knowledgeable with the current status of #1057 could provide an update?  I’m sure that I’m not the only viewer who is curious and interested.</p>
<p>Btw… I think it is Awesome to see some younger photographers submitting their work here on RPca!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric May</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19203#comment-9468</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 10:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/68.jpg#comment-9468</guid>
		<description>When 1057 was running, I was told it used a lot more coal so 136 was the preferred engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When 1057 was running, I was told it used a lot more coal so 136 was the preferred engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrDan</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19203#comment-9458</link>
		<dc:creator>MrDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 20:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/68.jpg#comment-9458</guid>
		<description>Probably just stored until eventual overhauling, with all the neat bits removed to prevent never-do-wells from removing them. 136 and 1057 are two different models of steam locomotive, so there would be little if any common parts between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably just stored until eventual overhauling, with all the neat bits removed to prevent never-do-wells from removing them. 136 and 1057 are two different models of steam locomotive, so there would be little if any common parts between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
