<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CP&#8217;s business train &#8220;40B&#8221; departs Agincourt Yard after a short stop for a recrew and some fuel. An observant friend of mine pointed out that the consist only featured units in the &#8220;block&#8221; scheme as opposed to mixing in &#8220;script&#8221; units. Perhaps on purpose, or just a neat coincidence? Either way the ACU looked sharp as did the rest of the train.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/cps-business-train-40b-departs-agincourt-yard-after-a-short-stop-for-a-recrew-and-some-fuel-an-observant-friend-of-mine-pointed-out-that-the-consist-only-featured-units-in-the-block-scheme/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 23:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trainsintoronto</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46701#comment-48406</link>
		<dc:creator>trainsintoronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 04:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IMG_1777-1.jpg#comment-48406</guid>
		<description>@Steve, I&#039;ve gotta say I&#039;d definitely take that pair of 38s any day over this most recent setup. It&#039;s unfortunate that 3084 doesn&#039;t seem to really be around anymore, plus the fact that it lost it&#039;s class lights and factory numberboards in the most recent rebuild.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve, I&#8217;ve gotta say I&#8217;d definitely take that pair of 38s any day over this most recent setup. It&#8217;s unfortunate that 3084 doesn&#8217;t seem to really be around anymore, plus the fact that it lost it&#8217;s class lights and factory numberboards in the most recent rebuild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46701#comment-48398</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 23:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IMG_1777-1.jpg#comment-48398</guid>
		<description>Worst? It&#039;s the best part. It&#039;s like a classic Generator/APU which you&#039;d find on older CN / CP trains with non steam heated equipped locos or on the ONR passenger trains with their APU.

Just another &#039;change&#039; of variety on the CP business trains - if it was F units all the time it would just be boring!

This is a perfect example of the variety.. I remember we were a bit complainy about lack of F units but this train really grew on me - it was a one way trip from the USA too!

http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=9971</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst? It&#8217;s the best part. It&#8217;s like a classic Generator/APU which you&#8217;d find on older CN / CP trains with non steam heated equipped locos or on the ONR passenger trains with their APU.</p>
<p>Just another &#8216;change&#8217; of variety on the CP business trains &#8211; if it was F units all the time it would just be boring!</p>
<p>This is a perfect example of the variety.. I remember we were a bit complainy about lack of F units but this train really grew on me &#8211; it was a one way trip from the USA too!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=9971" rel="nofollow">http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=9971</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Molnar</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46701#comment-48395</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Molnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IMG_1777-1.jpg#comment-48395</guid>
		<description>It was kind of odd how they had the F units set up now that you mention it haha  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was kind of odd how they had the F units set up now that you mention it haha  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cp5756</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46701#comment-48394</link>
		<dc:creator>cp5756</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IMG_1777-1.jpg#comment-48394</guid>
		<description>The worst part of this consist is definetly the F9B last out with the A unit facing into it, very unorthodox setup of F units! although I heard that setup had to do with trying out 1900&#039;S MU post rebuild? either way great shot Mike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst part of this consist is definetly the F9B last out with the A unit facing into it, very unorthodox setup of F units! although I heard that setup had to do with trying out 1900&#8242;S MU post rebuild? either way great shot Mike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46701#comment-48390</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IMG_1777-1.jpg#comment-48390</guid>
		<description>&quot;observant&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;observant&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
