<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ducking under Liverpool Road overpass, GO Transit GP40TC 9807 trails a westbound 3-car consist of Hawkers (with cab car 9855 leading) that has just departed Pickering GO Station, and is heading through the plant at &#8220;Liverpool&#8221; on CN&#8217;s Kingston Subdivision.

As GO was still in its infancy, Pickering was the easternmost station on its initial Oakville-Pickering Lakeshore corridor, and the GO Sub didn&#8217;t exist yet. The track branching off to the right on the incline is CN&#8217;s York Sub, part of the &#8220;Toronto Bypass&#8221; project that helped divert CN freight traffic around Toronto and made a new GO commuter service possible.

Original photographer unknown, Dan Dell&#8217;Unto collection slide.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/ducking-under-liverpool-road-overpass-go-transit-gp40tc-9807-trails-a-westbound-3-car-consist-of-hawkers-with-cab-car-9855-leading-that-has-just-departed-pickering-go-station-and-is-heading-throug/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatterWood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=50253#comment-54246</link>
		<dc:creator>MatterWood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/GO-9807-at-Liverpool-Pickering-ON-1971-d.May-1972-docu0009-uk-DDcoll-vAexs-copy.jpg#comment-54246</guid>
		<description>@dwarne, Up until last year there was one on the South Connecting Track just Westside of Union Station, it was very slow track but it was still CTC territory so it felt a little weird to drive on, no TOP required but you better have been damn sure you weren&#039;t going to come face to face with anything.. Given the year this was taken I would be shocked if any form of protection would have been necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dwarne, Up until last year there was one on the South Connecting Track just Westside of Union Station, it was very slow track but it was still CTC territory so it felt a little weird to drive on, no TOP required but you better have been damn sure you weren&#8217;t going to come face to face with anything.. Given the year this was taken I would be shocked if any form of protection would have been necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwarne</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=50253#comment-54239</link>
		<dc:creator>dwarne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/GO-9807-at-Liverpool-Pickering-ON-1971-d.May-1972-docu0009-uk-DDcoll-vAexs-copy.jpg#comment-54239</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, a gantlet road crossing for the signal maintainer, how many instances of that are still around.  Would that be allowed without a TOP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, a gantlet road crossing for the signal maintainer, how many instances of that are still around.  Would that be allowed without a TOP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
