<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: During 1994, CN had acquired 24 SD40-2’s from Union Pacific, that were originally numbered UP 4090-4102, B4103, 4104, 4106-4114. CN quickly temporarily renumbered them by changing the first number to a ‘6 from 4’ to cycle them into service. These units were seen all over the CN network that year and eventually became CN 5364-5387 by 1995 after being remanufactured at AMF in Montreal.

Here is a link to a great photo of a pair of the former UP SD40-2’s on opposite trains taken by Arnold Mooney. HERE 

Here CN train 238 with 9307, a renumbered former UP SD40-2 and a CN GP40-2L(W) are seen heading towards the former Snake Road walk bridge (now named Beth Jacob Court) on the Oakville Subdivision, just east of Bayview Junction.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/during-1994-cn-had-acquired-24-sd40-2%e2%80%99s-from-union-pacific-that-were-originally-numbered-up-4090-4102-b4103-4104-4106-4114-cn-quickly-temporarily-renumbered-them-by-changing-the-first-nu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 05:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=42042#comment-41114</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CN-9307-Version-1.jpg#comment-41114</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree Arnold. I don&#039;t think these were as common in the lead even by 1994 as I seem to recall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree Arnold. I don&#8217;t think these were as common in the lead even by 1994 as I seem to recall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=42042#comment-41103</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 22:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CN-9307-Version-1.jpg#comment-41103</guid>
		<description>Nice leader as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice leader as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
