<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMD&#8217;s three window cab design was only used on its F59PH, SD60M and the CP only SD40-2F models. CP had no interest in the SD60 at the time a pushed EMD to revive the SD40-2 model even though the builder at the time had moved on to bigger and better designs. CP loved the SD40 and collected a fleet of hundreds at the time, unfortunately the SD40-2F never lived up to CP&#8217;s expectations with a number of issues arising over the years and in the end the small fleet of so called &#8220;Red Barns&#8221; would be eliminated from the roster a lot sooner then expected. Many standard cab SD40-2&#8242;s are still running for the Class One railroad today. In an interesting twist of fate CP&#8217;s purchase of the CMQ would bring several of the surviving SD40-2F&#8217;s back to its former owner, and surprisingly most are still active today. I have to admit, while I liked the units in CP paint, the CMQ part looks much more impressive. Thanks to a tip today I was able to catch both CMQ 9020 and 9011 assigned to a ballast train headed for the Hamilton subdivision to dump ballast along the line. With CP trains #246, 247 and 254 all in the area, the train was forced to hold the main at Milton for an hour while the other traffic was cleared out of the way.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/emds-three-window-cab-design-was-only-used-on-its-f59ph-sd60m-and-the-cp-only-sd40-2f-models-cp-had-no-interest-in-the-sd60-at-the-time-a-pushed-emd-to-revive-the-sd40-2-model-even-though-the-buil/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.L.Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=45121#comment-45965</link>
		<dc:creator>R.L.Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/IMG_0857.jpeg#comment-45965</guid>
		<description>&quot;... the SD40-2F never lived up to CP&#039;s expectations with a number of issues arising over the years....&quot;

Yet, here they are, still hauling tonnage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; the SD40-2F never lived up to CP&#8217;s expectations with a number of issues arising over the years&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet, here they are, still hauling tonnage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=45121#comment-45942</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/IMG_0857.jpeg#comment-45942</guid>
		<description>Good Show!!!  First picture up of this train gets my star. :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Show!!!  First picture up of this train gets my star. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
