<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GEXR 3821 leads CN Geometry train south through Exeter Ontario on the GEXR Exeter Sub.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/gexr-3821-leads-cn-geometry-train-south-through-exeter-ontario-on-the-gexr-exeter-sub/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 01:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=15642#comment-5654</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/IMG_0072-June-8-2014.jpg#comment-5654</guid>
		<description>This is actually pretty cool.  It would have made more sense if the SOR had ran up from Garnet with a locomotive and crew to Brantford to tack onto the end like the GEXR did.  It would have made the crews life a lot easier instead of backing all the way down to Nanticoke..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually pretty cool.  It would have made more sense if the SOR had ran up from Garnet with a locomotive and crew to Brantford to tack onto the end like the GEXR did.  It would have made the crews life a lot easier instead of backing all the way down to Nanticoke..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
