<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I barely recall taking this picture. And have forgotten the station.  GO 706 is the push-power on this Burlington-bound train, as seen in the days before bi-levels. Unfortunately I did not record the power car on the lead. Anyone know when this station was removed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/i-barely-recall-taking-this-picture-and-have-forgotten-the-station-go-706-is-the-push-power-on-this-burlington-bound-train-as-seen-in-the-days-before-bi-levels-unfortunately-i-did-not-record-the/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oakvillesub5</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29804#comment-21963</link>
		<dc:creator>Oakvillesub5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Oakville441-edited.jpg#comment-21963</guid>
		<description>Cool! This station design is pretty common, I believe the midland station is pretty similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! This station design is pretty common, I believe the midland station is pretty similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Steinman</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29804#comment-21904</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Steinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 02:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Oakville441-edited.jpg#comment-21904</guid>
		<description>Original GTR station for Oakville did look better than the modern structure showing in Arnolds shot....it was similar in design to that at Port Credit, etc. This station was built in the 60&#039;s...possibly the last of its kind in design for the CNR. Arnold. ..your Intel as to the second station (shown in your photo) is correct.  Despite modifications by Via in early 2000s...it was demolished around 2009. Todays station was built beside this building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Original GTR station for Oakville did look better than the modern structure showing in Arnolds shot&#8230;.it was similar in design to that at Port Credit, etc. This station was built in the 60&#8242;s&#8230;possibly the last of its kind in design for the CNR. Arnold. ..your Intel as to the second station (shown in your photo) is correct.  Despite modifications by Via in early 2000s&#8230;it was demolished around 2009. Todays station was built beside this building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29804#comment-21903</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Oakville441-edited.jpg#comment-21903</guid>
		<description>Nice shot! It always amazed me how such a nice city like Oakville had such an ugly station. Always wondered what happened to the original station, which had to look better then this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice shot! It always amazed me how such a nice city like Oakville had such an ugly station. Always wondered what happened to the original station, which had to look better then this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29804#comment-21902</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Oakville441-edited.jpg#comment-21902</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m told it lasted until March 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m told it lasted until March 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29804#comment-21887</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Oakville441-edited.jpg#comment-21887</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think it was ever &quot; removed &quot;, simply modified several times since the mid 1980s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think it was ever &#8221; removed &#8220;, simply modified several times since the mid 1980s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
