<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I just do not see any of these any more.  CN Flanger 56497 is shown in the yard at Capreol some years ago. The railroad had a handful of these converted boxcars at one time and I have to assume they are scrapped (Or in museums) This particular one, developed from 40 ft boxcar #481101, I have been unable to find information on since the early 1990s. I&#8217;m sure someone out there can present a run-down on the whereabouts of the former 56000 series fleet.  Thank you in advance.!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/i-just-do-not-see-any-of-these-any-more-cn-flanger-56497-is-shown-in-the-yard-at-capreol-some-years-ago-the-railroad-had-a-handful-of-these-converted-boxcars-at-one-time-and-i-have-to-assume-they-a/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=58949#comment-68802</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1981-05-12-Capreol-ON.-CN-van-56497.jpg#comment-68802</guid>
		<description>Your informative commentary is always appreciated, Ronald, even if you think you ramble on so. There are no wasted words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your informative commentary is always appreciated, Ronald, even if you think you ramble on so. There are no wasted words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonaldB</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=58949#comment-68799</link>
		<dc:creator>RonaldB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 03:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1981-05-12-Capreol-ON.-CN-van-56497.jpg#comment-68799</guid>
		<description>Canadian Pacific had &quot;fleet&quot; of flangers, but the only ones I saw in my career were those we set off or picked up at Galt, travelling between the GRR/LE&amp;N and the CP car shops in Toronto for annual servicing. 
Instead of flangers, snow plows were usually run also run to clean out the  &quot;flange&quot;, or snow pack between the rails, in my time on CP. 
Packed snow could actually affect operations as a snowy winter wore on.  Two locations on the London Division where this was a problem, were the loop at Goderich and the westward (north) track of the Galt Sub between Streetsville &amp; Guelph Jct. Before CTC was installed between Dixie &amp; Guelph Jct, a current of traffic was in effect, westward trains used the north track &amp; eastward trains, the south. Almost all westbounds were filled out to tonnage &amp; climbed the hill at a crawl. As snow packed in between the rails,the incidence of trains stalling climbed until they ran the double track plow to clear out the flange. Once CTC was in place plenty of eastbounds ran on the north track &amp; blew the snow away, instead of it packing. 
Arnold, I know this long essay isn&#039;t what you were looking for, but your photos have a bad habit of triggering my old memories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian Pacific had &#8220;fleet&#8221; of flangers, but the only ones I saw in my career were those we set off or picked up at Galt, travelling between the GRR/LE&amp;N and the CP car shops in Toronto for annual servicing.<br />
Instead of flangers, snow plows were usually run also run to clean out the  &#8220;flange&#8221;, or snow pack between the rails, in my time on CP.<br />
Packed snow could actually affect operations as a snowy winter wore on.  Two locations on the London Division where this was a problem, were the loop at Goderich and the westward (north) track of the Galt Sub between Streetsville &amp; Guelph Jct. Before CTC was installed between Dixie &amp; Guelph Jct, a current of traffic was in effect, westward trains used the north track &amp; eastward trains, the south. Almost all westbounds were filled out to tonnage &amp; climbed the hill at a crawl. As snow packed in between the rails,the incidence of trains stalling climbed until they ran the double track plow to clear out the flange. Once CTC was in place plenty of eastbounds ran on the north track &amp; blew the snow away, instead of it packing.<br />
Arnold, I know this long essay isn&#8217;t what you were looking for, but your photos have a bad habit of triggering my old memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
