<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I used to enjoy those warm summer nights on the hillside at Bayview Jct. Back when there was no hassles, no strange characters, &#8230;.nothing to bother me but the bugs.  The sweet memories returned as I looked at this image. Armed with an almost useless camera, pegged at 1/25th second, anything moving over 15 MPH required &#8216;panning&#8217; to get some sort of decent photo. Which explains this one. I understand the 9804, originally 604, was renumbered to 504 in early 1975. I assume it was repainted then as well.  Anyone have knowledge of when the repainting to white and green began and eventually was completed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/i-used-to-enjoy-those-warm-summer-nights-on-the-hillside-at-bayview-jct-back-when-there-was-no-hassles-no-strange-characters-nothing-to-bother-me-but-the-bugs-the-sweet-memories-returned-as-i/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 18:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31182#comment-48332</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 03:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GO-9804-4589-edited.jpg#comment-48332</guid>
		<description>This was the original paint scheme for GO Transit. We are now with third version.of paint jobs with GO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the original paint scheme for GO Transit. We are now with third version.of paint jobs with GO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31182#comment-24014</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GO-9804-4589-edited.jpg#comment-24014</guid>
		<description>I think we need a GO heritage unit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need a GO heritage unit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrDan</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31182#comment-24012</link>
		<dc:creator>MrDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GO-9804-4589-edited.jpg#comment-24012</guid>
		<description>I think it first showed up around 1973 on the first GP40-2W units, delivered in that scheme. IIRC the GP40TC&#039;s went in for refurbishing/rebuilding starting in 1975 and came out in that scheme still as 9800&#039;s (later renumbered 500&#039;s).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it first showed up around 1973 on the first GP40-2W units, delivered in that scheme. IIRC the GP40TC&#8217;s went in for refurbishing/rebuilding starting in 1975 and came out in that scheme still as 9800&#8242;s (later renumbered 500&#8242;s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31182#comment-24010</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GO-9804-4589-edited.jpg#comment-24010</guid>
		<description>That should read 1974-5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should read 1974-5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31182#comment-24009</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GO-9804-4589-edited.jpg#comment-24009</guid>
		<description>Brad, for some reason there are not all that many shots of this paint scheme floating around. I believe it was the original scheme, and it ended around 19745 as most all were painted to the familiar green we saw for so many years. What I am wondering is when the first &#039;green&#039; units actually appeared. Someone out there who worked for GO should have knowledge, but it is already more than 40 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, for some reason there are not all that many shots of this paint scheme floating around. I believe it was the original scheme, and it ended around 19745 as most all were painted to the familiar green we saw for so many years. What I am wondering is when the first &#8216;green&#8217; units actually appeared. Someone out there who worked for GO should have knowledge, but it is already more than 40 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31182#comment-24005</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GO-9804-4589-edited.jpg#comment-24005</guid>
		<description>Ha..I remember panning back in the day. Was that GO scheme a test ? I was only 2 at the time but i&#039;ve only seen a few shots of this colour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha..I remember panning back in the day. Was that GO scheme a test ? I was only 2 at the time but i&#8217;ve only seen a few shots of this colour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
