<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If I hadn&#8217;t seen it, I wouldn&#8217;t have believed it&#8230; Southern Ontario Railway used RLHH SD40-2 3404 as one of two units on 496 to switch Ingenia today. Has there ever been a six-axle unit on the Burford Spur or the TH&amp;B in Brantford before? In the photo the conductor is seen getting back on board RLK 4057 after protecting the crossing of Clarence Street/Colborne Street.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/if-i-hadnt-seen-it-i-wouldnt-have-believed-it-southern-ontario-railway-used-rlhh-sd40-2-3404-as-one-of-two-units-on-496-to-switch-ingenia-today-has-there-ever-been-a-six-axle-unit-on-the-burf/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9039</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 13:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9039</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Brad. The CN GP9rm derailed on the private crossing in the middle of the &quot;S&quot; curve beside Clarence Street South. It was winter and the crossing flanges were packed with ice, causing the wheels to lift up and derail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Brad. The CN GP9rm derailed on the private crossing in the middle of the &#8220;S&#8221; curve beside Clarence Street South. It was winter and the crossing flanges were packed with ice, causing the wheels to lift up and derail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9038</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 13:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9038</guid>
		<description>I remember seeing a photo up here of the CN GP9m on the ground right at that curve you speak of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember seeing a photo up here of the CN GP9m on the ground right at that curve you speak of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9034</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 03:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9034</guid>
		<description>Definitely a huge risk, when I was driving home on Wednesday (on Clarence) I was looking at the curves the line makes and was thinking that the 6 axle was lucky not to have ended up on the ground...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a huge risk, when I was driving home on Wednesday (on Clarence) I was looking at the curves the line makes and was thinking that the 6 axle was lucky not to have ended up on the ground&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9033</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 03:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9033</guid>
		<description>I think they took a huge risk running that 6-axle down there....but certainly makes for interesting conversation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they took a huge risk running that 6-axle down there&#8230;.but certainly makes for interesting conversation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9032</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 01:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9032</guid>
		<description>There you go, I learned something. What is obvious to some may not be obvious to all. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go, I learned something. What is obvious to some may not be obvious to all. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9031</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 00:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9031</guid>
		<description>Well the head light does in a way, because the headlight switch would be set to Single or Intermediate as it is here.....technically it could be left as such if MU&#039;d, but most guys would flip the headlight switch to Controlling unit when Multipled. Just saying!

But the lack of jumper cable is the key missing item.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the head light does in a way, because the headlight switch would be set to Single or Intermediate as it is here&#8230;..technically it could be left as such if MU&#8217;d, but most guys would flip the headlight switch to Controlling unit when Multipled. Just saying!</p>
<p>But the lack of jumper cable is the key missing item.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9030</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 00:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9030</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the explanation... I don&#039;t think the headlight has anything to do with it, but you&#039;re right about the MU cable. They used the SD for switching the plant, otherwise it was just along for the ride to/from Ingenia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the explanation&#8230; I don&#8217;t think the headlight has anything to do with it, but you&#8217;re right about the MU cable. They used the SD for switching the plant, otherwise it was just along for the ride to/from Ingenia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9029</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9029</guid>
		<description>And I didn&#039;t say it wasn&#039;t running, just not online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I didn&#8217;t say it wasn&#8217;t running, just not online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9028</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9028</guid>
		<description>The first clue, is the rear headlight on 4057 is on.

The second clue, look close.....there&#039;s no jumper cable connecting 4057 and 3404. Both the MU and the dummy plug flaps are closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first clue, is the rear headlight on 4057 is on.</p>
<p>The second clue, look close&#8230;..there&#8217;s no jumper cable connecting 4057 and 3404. Both the MU and the dummy plug flaps are closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18803#comment-9016</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 23:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DSC_6059m.jpg#comment-9016</guid>
		<description>RLK2211, how can you tell a locomotive is not running just by seeing the front 1/3 of it in a photograph?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RLK2211, how can you tell a locomotive is not running just by seeing the front 1/3 of it in a photograph?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
