<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In reply to that smooth Ballast Train contribution from James Adeney (attachment_id=7780) from the other day regarding his comments on the &#8220;ugly&#8221; ballast put down on the Galt sub over the summer of 1979, here is another example shot in Milton 2 days previous. The train is working its&#8217; way westward, and this is a brief moment in time where tremendous clouds of grey sooty dust was not billowing thru the air. Instead, it was stack exhaust. And true to James&#8217; words, the power was always interesting, always changing.  Here we see RS-10 #8559 and GP35 5019 along with that straggler, RS-3 8446.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/in-reply-to-that-smooth-ballast-train-contribution-from-james-adeney-attachment_id7780-from-the-other-day-regarding-his-comments-on-the-ugly-ballast-put-down-on-the-galt-sub-over-the-summer-of/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 16:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonaldB</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7837#comment-45146</link>
		<dc:creator>RonaldB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 05:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Ballast-Spread-take-2.jpg#comment-45146</guid>
		<description>Lots of power was needed as they were often pulling a &#039;skate&#039; under the ties to lift the rail out of the old ballast.  There were a lot of signal issues when the black slag ballast was first installed, because of its high metal content (it was skimmings from Sudbury mines) it was conductive &amp; until a couple of rainfalls oxidized it, sometimes short circuits would mess things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of power was needed as they were often pulling a &#8216;skate&#8217; under the ties to lift the rail out of the old ballast.  There were a lot of signal issues when the black slag ballast was first installed, because of its high metal content (it was skimmings from Sudbury mines) it was conductive &amp; until a couple of rainfalls oxidized it, sometimes short circuits would mess things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpurcell</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7837#comment-5718</link>
		<dc:creator>dpurcell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Ballast-Spread-take-2.jpg#comment-5718</guid>
		<description>Great shot of an interesting lashup Arnold! It would look good in HO scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shot of an interesting lashup Arnold! It would look good in HO scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex181</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7837#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex181</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Ballast-Spread-take-2.jpg#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>Very great shot! lot of nice smoke and good power!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very great shot! lot of nice smoke and good power!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
