<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting view of some old MLW switchers now stored and out of service. The closest unit to me, the 7077; in a few weeks departed for eventual display at Exporail in Quebec. It is of major disappointment now as I look back at this day and regret being told that &#8216;my presence was not required&#8217; by yard personnel, which was a very polite way of telling me to &#8216;get lost&#8217;.  As a result I did not get to record any other numbers save for the visible  6588 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;
Nice that the Sudbury watertower highlights the background, giving good ID to this image.

On the right are CP 1805 and 8775 in behind.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/interesting-view-of-some-old-mlw-switchers-now-stored-and-out-of-service-the-closest-unit-to-me-the-7077-in-a-few-weeks-departed-for-eventual-display-at-exporail-in-quebec-it-is-of-major-disappoin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35868#comment-30595</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 02:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CP-storage-1984-edited.jpg#comment-30595</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dan. A year later a similar string of switchers occupied that track, along with CR 7779.
CP 7090 was also around at this time,IIRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dan. A year later a similar string of switchers occupied that track, along with CR 7779.<br />
CP 7090 was also around at this time,IIRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colm</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35868#comment-30581</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CP-storage-1984-edited.jpg#comment-30581</guid>
		<description>Wow. If only it was like that today, apart from the Gp20, Sd30, and sd60 with the odd road unit mixed in, Sudbury is kinda bland for the CP side of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. If only it was like that today, apart from the Gp20, Sd30, and sd60 with the odd road unit mixed in, Sudbury is kinda bland for the CP side of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrDan</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35868#comment-30573</link>
		<dc:creator>MrDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CP-storage-1984-edited.jpg#comment-30573</guid>
		<description>Hmm, the best I could find is the September 1981 assignment sheet showing units 6576 6594 6612 7091-7092 7099 7107-7108 assigned Sudbury, and 6542 6588 7024 7077 7089 assigned North Bay. Perhaps some of those others lasted long enough to be in this deadline. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the best I could find is the September 1981 assignment sheet showing units 6576 6594 6612 7091-7092 7099 7107-7108 assigned Sudbury, and 6542 6588 7024 7077 7089 assigned North Bay. Perhaps some of those others lasted long enough to be in this deadline. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
